diff options
author | Paolo Bonzini | 2023-12-13 07:21:35 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paolo Bonzini | 2023-12-13 07:27:36 -0500 |
commit | e39120ab8a04e5eb304cee3cfb42d628eb1f0d48 (patch) | |
tree | 07e78309399f080e4ffa6b1a83cfd9644125f683 | |
parent | 4cdf351d3630a640ab6a05721ef055b9df62277f (diff) |
KVM: selftests: Fix dynamic generation of configuration names
When we dynamically generate a name for a configuration in get-reg-list
we use strcat() to append to a buffer allocated using malloc() but we
never initialise that buffer. Since malloc() offers no guarantees
regarding the contents of the memory it returns this can lead to us
corrupting, and likely overflowing, the buffer:
vregs: PASS
vregs+pmu: PASS
sve: PASS
sve+pmu: PASS
vregs+pauth_address+pauth_generic: PASS
X?vr+gspauth_addre+spauth_generi+pmu: PASS
The bug is that strcat() should have been strcpy(), and that replacement
would be enough to fix it, but there are other things in the function
that leave something to be desired. In particular, an (incorrectly)
empty config would cause an out of bounds access to c->name[-1].
Since the strcpy() call relies on c->name[0..len-1] being initialized,
enforce that invariant throughout the function.
Fixes: 2f9ace5d4557 ("KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Introduce vcpu configs")
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Co-developed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Message-Id: <20231211-kvm-get-reg-list-str-init-v3-1-6554c71c77b1@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c index be7bf5224434..8274ef04301f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c @@ -71,11 +71,12 @@ static const char *config_name(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) for_each_sublist(c, s) { if (!strcmp(s->name, "base")) continue; - strcat(c->name + len, s->name); - len += strlen(s->name) + 1; - c->name[len - 1] = '+'; + if (len) + c->name[len++] = '+'; + strcpy(c->name + len, s->name); + len += strlen(s->name); } - c->name[len - 1] = '\0'; + c->name[len] = '\0'; return c->name; } |