aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMark Rutland2020-02-21 14:50:21 +0000
committerCatalin Marinas2020-03-13 17:34:25 +0000
commit1db5cdeccd813330aaab19b3fccab15e1d07fe12 (patch)
treebee0dfa4d50b024bd34fe1024b74e4b574ce5192
parentf8788d86ab28f61f7b46eb6be375f8a726783636 (diff)
arm64: cpufeature: add cpus_have_final_cap()
When cpus_have_const_cap() was originally introduced it was intended to be safe in hyp context, where it is not safe to access the cpu_hwcaps array as cpus_have_cap() did. For more details see commit: a4023f682739439b ("arm64: Add hypervisor safe helper for checking constant capabilities") We then made use of cpus_have_const_cap() throughout the kernel. Subsequently, we had to defer updating the static_key associated with each capability in order to avoid lockdep complaints. To avoid breaking kernel-wide usage of cpus_have_const_cap(), this was updated to fall back to the cpu_hwcaps array if called before the static_keys were updated. As the kvm hyp code was only called later than this, the fallback is redundant but not functionally harmful. For more details, see commit: 63a1e1c95e60e798 ("arm64/cpufeature: don't use mutex in bringup path") Today we have more users of cpus_have_const_cap() which are only called once the relevant static keys are initialized, and it would be beneficial to avoid the redundant code. To that end, this patch adds a new cpus_have_final_cap(), helper which is intend to be used in code which is only run once capabilities have been finalized, and will never check the cpus_hwcap array. This helps the compiler to generate better code as it no longer needs to generate code to address and test the cpus_hwcap array. To help catch misuse, cpus_have_final_cap() will BUG() if called before capabilities are finalized. In hyp context, BUG() will result in a hyp panic, but the specific BUG() instance will not be identified in the usual way. Comments are added to the various cpus_have_*_cap() helpers to describe the constraints on when they can be used. For clarity cpus_have_cap() is moved above the other helpers. Similarly the helpers are updated to use system_capabilities_finalized() consistently, and this is made __always_inline as required by its new callers. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-rw-r--r--arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h58
1 files changed, 47 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 92ef9539874a..940b2b67b428 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -390,14 +390,16 @@ unsigned long cpu_get_elf_hwcap2(void);
#define cpu_set_named_feature(name) cpu_set_feature(cpu_feature(name))
#define cpu_have_named_feature(name) cpu_have_feature(cpu_feature(name))
-/* System capability check for constant caps */
-static __always_inline bool __cpus_have_const_cap(int num)
+static __always_inline bool system_capabilities_finalized(void)
{
- if (num >= ARM64_NCAPS)
- return false;
- return static_branch_unlikely(&cpu_hwcap_keys[num]);
+ return static_branch_likely(&arm64_const_caps_ready);
}
+/*
+ * Test for a capability with a runtime check.
+ *
+ * Before the capability is detected, this returns false.
+ */
static inline bool cpus_have_cap(unsigned int num)
{
if (num >= ARM64_NCAPS)
@@ -405,14 +407,53 @@ static inline bool cpus_have_cap(unsigned int num)
return test_bit(num, cpu_hwcaps);
}
+/*
+ * Test for a capability without a runtime check.
+ *
+ * Before capabilities are finalized, this returns false.
+ * After capabilities are finalized, this is patched to avoid a runtime check.
+ *
+ * @num must be a compile-time constant.
+ */
+static __always_inline bool __cpus_have_const_cap(int num)
+{
+ if (num >= ARM64_NCAPS)
+ return false;
+ return static_branch_unlikely(&cpu_hwcap_keys[num]);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test for a capability, possibly with a runtime check.
+ *
+ * Before capabilities are finalized, this behaves as cpus_have_cap().
+ * After capabilities are finalized, this is patched to avoid a runtime check.
+ *
+ * @num must be a compile-time constant.
+ */
static __always_inline bool cpus_have_const_cap(int num)
{
- if (static_branch_likely(&arm64_const_caps_ready))
+ if (system_capabilities_finalized())
return __cpus_have_const_cap(num);
else
return cpus_have_cap(num);
}
+/*
+ * Test for a capability without a runtime check.
+ *
+ * Before capabilities are finalized, this will BUG().
+ * After capabilities are finalized, this is patched to avoid a runtime check.
+ *
+ * @num must be a compile-time constant.
+ */
+static __always_inline bool cpus_have_final_cap(int num)
+{
+ if (system_capabilities_finalized())
+ return __cpus_have_const_cap(num);
+ else
+ BUG();
+}
+
static inline void cpus_set_cap(unsigned int num)
{
if (num >= ARM64_NCAPS) {
@@ -613,11 +654,6 @@ static inline bool system_has_prio_mask_debugging(void)
system_uses_irq_prio_masking();
}
-static inline bool system_capabilities_finalized(void)
-{
- return static_branch_likely(&arm64_const_caps_ready);
-}
-
#define ARM64_BP_HARDEN_UNKNOWN -1
#define ARM64_BP_HARDEN_WA_NEEDED 0
#define ARM64_BP_HARDEN_NOT_REQUIRED 1