diff options
author | Jason Low | 2014-05-08 17:49:22 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar | 2014-05-22 11:16:32 +0200 |
commit | 52a08ef1f13a11289c9e18cd4cfb4e51c024058b (patch) | |
tree | fbdde6221312e3ab2ea3a258a94d3e24dace5c54 | |
parent | a9467fa3cd2d5bf39e7cb7d0706d29d7ef4df212 (diff) |
sched: Fix the rq->next_balance logic in rebalance_domains() and idle_balance()
Currently, in idle_balance(), we update rq->next_balance when we pull_tasks.
However, it is also important to update this in the !pulled_tasks case too.
When the CPU is "busy" (the CPU isn't idle), rq->next_balance gets computed
using sd->busy_factor (so we increase the balance interval when the CPU is
busy). However, when the CPU goes idle, rq->next_balance could still be set
to a large value that was computed with the sd->busy_factor.
Thus, we need to also update rq->next_balance in idle_balance() in the cases
where !pulled_tasks too, so that rq->next_balance gets updated without taking
the busy_factor into account when the CPU is about to go idle.
This patch makes rq->next_balance get updated independently of whether or
not we pulled_task. Also, we add logic to ensure that we always traverse
at least 1 of the sched domains to get a proper next_balance value for
updating rq->next_balance.
Additionally, since load_balance() modifies the sd->balance_interval, we
need to re-obtain the sched domain's interval after the call to
load_balance() in rebalance_domains() before we update rq->next_balance.
This patch adds and uses 2 new helper functions, update_next_balance() and
get_sd_balance_interval() to update next_balance and obtain the sched
domain's balance_interval.
Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
Cc: alex.shi@linaro.org
Cc: efault@gmx.de
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: aswin@hp.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1399596562.2200.7.camel@j-VirtualBox
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/fair.c | 69 |
1 files changed, 46 insertions, 23 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 429164d117ea..26ec6686a00b 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -6672,17 +6672,44 @@ out: return ld_moved; } +static inline unsigned long +get_sd_balance_interval(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu_busy) +{ + unsigned long interval = sd->balance_interval; + + if (cpu_busy) + interval *= sd->busy_factor; + + /* scale ms to jiffies */ + interval = msecs_to_jiffies(interval); + interval = clamp(interval, 1UL, max_load_balance_interval); + + return interval; +} + +static inline void +update_next_balance(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu_busy, unsigned long *next_balance) +{ + unsigned long interval, next; + + interval = get_sd_balance_interval(sd, cpu_busy); + next = sd->last_balance + interval; + + if (time_after(*next_balance, next)) + *next_balance = next; +} + /* * idle_balance is called by schedule() if this_cpu is about to become * idle. Attempts to pull tasks from other CPUs. */ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq) { + unsigned long next_balance = jiffies + HZ; + int this_cpu = this_rq->cpu; struct sched_domain *sd; int pulled_task = 0; - unsigned long next_balance = jiffies + HZ; u64 curr_cost = 0; - int this_cpu = this_rq->cpu; idle_enter_fair(this_rq); @@ -6692,8 +6719,15 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq) */ this_rq->idle_stamp = rq_clock(this_rq); - if (this_rq->avg_idle < sysctl_sched_migration_cost) + if (this_rq->avg_idle < sysctl_sched_migration_cost) { + rcu_read_lock(); + sd = rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain(this_rq->sd); + if (sd) + update_next_balance(sd, 0, &next_balance); + rcu_read_unlock(); + goto out; + } /* * Drop the rq->lock, but keep IRQ/preempt disabled. @@ -6703,15 +6737,16 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq) update_blocked_averages(this_cpu); rcu_read_lock(); for_each_domain(this_cpu, sd) { - unsigned long interval; int continue_balancing = 1; u64 t0, domain_cost; if (!(sd->flags & SD_LOAD_BALANCE)) continue; - if (this_rq->avg_idle < curr_cost + sd->max_newidle_lb_cost) + if (this_rq->avg_idle < curr_cost + sd->max_newidle_lb_cost) { + update_next_balance(sd, 0, &next_balance); break; + } if (sd->flags & SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE) { t0 = sched_clock_cpu(this_cpu); @@ -6727,9 +6762,7 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq) curr_cost += domain_cost; } - interval = msecs_to_jiffies(sd->balance_interval); - if (time_after(next_balance, sd->last_balance + interval)) - next_balance = sd->last_balance + interval; + update_next_balance(sd, 0, &next_balance); /* * Stop searching for tasks to pull if there are @@ -6753,15 +6786,11 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq) if (this_rq->cfs.h_nr_running && !pulled_task) pulled_task = 1; - if (pulled_task || time_after(jiffies, this_rq->next_balance)) { - /* - * We are going idle. next_balance may be set based on - * a busy processor. So reset next_balance. - */ +out: + /* Move the next balance forward */ + if (time_after(this_rq->next_balance, next_balance)) this_rq->next_balance = next_balance; - } -out: /* Is there a task of a high priority class? */ if (this_rq->nr_running != this_rq->cfs.h_nr_running) pulled_task = -1; @@ -7044,16 +7073,9 @@ static void rebalance_domains(struct rq *rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle) break; } - interval = sd->balance_interval; - if (idle != CPU_IDLE) - interval *= sd->busy_factor; - - /* scale ms to jiffies */ - interval = msecs_to_jiffies(interval); - interval = clamp(interval, 1UL, max_load_balance_interval); + interval = get_sd_balance_interval(sd, idle != CPU_IDLE); need_serialize = sd->flags & SD_SERIALIZE; - if (need_serialize) { if (!spin_trylock(&balancing)) goto out; @@ -7069,6 +7091,7 @@ static void rebalance_domains(struct rq *rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle) idle = idle_cpu(cpu) ? CPU_IDLE : CPU_NOT_IDLE; } sd->last_balance = jiffies; + interval = get_sd_balance_interval(sd, idle != CPU_IDLE); } if (need_serialize) spin_unlock(&balancing); |