aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Borkmann2019-05-24 01:46:26 +0200
committerDaniel Borkmann2019-05-24 01:46:31 +0200
commit5762a20b11ef261ae8436868555fab4340cb3ca0 (patch)
treee4715aaacbb75b910f1ff7c57f071fa5efec6aa4
parent29c677c86a15fadcf85f072f75d88ce37ceac452 (diff)
parentdc2a4ebc0b44a212fcf72242210e56aa17e7317b (diff)
Merge branch 'bpf-explored-states'
Alexei Starovoitov says: ==================== Convert explored_states array into hash table and use simple hash to reduce verifier peak memory consumption for programs with bpf2bpf calls. More details in patch 3. v1->v2: fixed Jakub's small nit in patch 1 ==================== Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-rw-r--r--include/linux/bpf_verifier.h2
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/verifier.c77
2 files changed, 50 insertions, 29 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 1305ccbd8fe6..405b502283c5 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ struct bpf_func_state {
struct bpf_verifier_state {
/* call stack tracking */
struct bpf_func_state *frame[MAX_CALL_FRAMES];
+ u32 insn_idx;
u32 curframe;
u32 active_spin_lock;
bool speculative;
@@ -233,6 +234,7 @@ struct bpf_insn_aux_data {
int sanitize_stack_off; /* stack slot to be cleared */
bool seen; /* this insn was processed by the verifier */
u8 alu_state; /* used in combination with alu_limit */
+ bool prune_point;
unsigned int orig_idx; /* original instruction index */
};
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 3f8b5443cc67..550091c7a46a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5436,7 +5436,25 @@ enum {
BRANCH = 2,
};
-#define STATE_LIST_MARK ((struct bpf_verifier_state_list *) -1L)
+static u32 state_htab_size(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
+{
+ return env->prog->len;
+}
+
+static struct bpf_verifier_state_list **explored_state(
+ struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+ int idx)
+{
+ struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state;
+ struct bpf_func_state *state = cur->frame[cur->curframe];
+
+ return &env->explored_states[(idx ^ state->callsite) % state_htab_size(env)];
+}
+
+static void init_explored_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int idx)
+{
+ env->insn_aux_data[idx].prune_point = true;
+}
/* t, w, e - match pseudo-code above:
* t - index of current instruction
@@ -5462,7 +5480,7 @@ static int push_insn(int t, int w, int e, struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
if (e == BRANCH)
/* mark branch target for state pruning */
- env->explored_states[w] = STATE_LIST_MARK;
+ init_explored_state(env, w);
if (insn_state[w] == 0) {
/* tree-edge */
@@ -5530,9 +5548,9 @@ peek_stack:
else if (ret < 0)
goto err_free;
if (t + 1 < insn_cnt)
- env->explored_states[t + 1] = STATE_LIST_MARK;
+ init_explored_state(env, t + 1);
if (insns[t].src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL) {
- env->explored_states[t] = STATE_LIST_MARK;
+ init_explored_state(env, t);
ret = push_insn(t, t + insns[t].imm + 1, BRANCH, env);
if (ret == 1)
goto peek_stack;
@@ -5555,10 +5573,10 @@ peek_stack:
* after every call and jump
*/
if (t + 1 < insn_cnt)
- env->explored_states[t + 1] = STATE_LIST_MARK;
+ init_explored_state(env, t + 1);
} else {
/* conditional jump with two edges */
- env->explored_states[t] = STATE_LIST_MARK;
+ init_explored_state(env, t);
ret = push_insn(t, t + 1, FALLTHROUGH, env);
if (ret == 1)
goto peek_stack;
@@ -6006,12 +6024,10 @@ static void clean_live_states(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn,
struct bpf_verifier_state_list *sl;
int i;
- sl = env->explored_states[insn];
- if (!sl)
- return;
-
- while (sl != STATE_LIST_MARK) {
- if (sl->state.curframe != cur->curframe)
+ sl = *explored_state(env, insn);
+ while (sl) {
+ if (sl->state.insn_idx != insn ||
+ sl->state.curframe != cur->curframe)
goto next;
for (i = 0; i <= cur->curframe; i++)
if (sl->state.frame[i]->callsite != cur->frame[i]->callsite)
@@ -6365,18 +6381,21 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx)
struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state, *new;
int i, j, err, states_cnt = 0;
- pprev = &env->explored_states[insn_idx];
- sl = *pprev;
-
- if (!sl)
+ if (!env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].prune_point)
/* this 'insn_idx' instruction wasn't marked, so we will not
* be doing state search here
*/
return 0;
+ pprev = explored_state(env, insn_idx);
+ sl = *pprev;
+
clean_live_states(env, insn_idx, cur);
- while (sl != STATE_LIST_MARK) {
+ while (sl) {
+ states_cnt++;
+ if (sl->state.insn_idx != insn_idx)
+ goto next;
if (states_equal(env, &sl->state, cur)) {
sl->hit_cnt++;
/* reached equivalent register/stack state,
@@ -6394,7 +6413,6 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx)
return err;
return 1;
}
- states_cnt++;
sl->miss_cnt++;
/* heuristic to determine whether this state is beneficial
* to keep checking from state equivalence point of view.
@@ -6421,6 +6439,7 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx)
sl = *pprev;
continue;
}
+next:
pprev = &sl->next;
sl = *pprev;
}
@@ -6452,8 +6471,9 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx)
kfree(new_sl);
return err;
}
- new_sl->next = env->explored_states[insn_idx];
- env->explored_states[insn_idx] = new_sl;
+ new->insn_idx = insn_idx;
+ new_sl->next = *explored_state(env, insn_idx);
+ *explored_state(env, insn_idx) = new_sl;
/* connect new state to parentage chain. Current frame needs all
* registers connected. Only r6 - r9 of the callers are alive (pushed
* to the stack implicitly by JITs) so in callers' frames connect just
@@ -8131,16 +8151,15 @@ static void free_states(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
if (!env->explored_states)
return;
- for (i = 0; i < env->prog->len; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < state_htab_size(env); i++) {
sl = env->explored_states[i];
- if (sl)
- while (sl != STATE_LIST_MARK) {
- sln = sl->next;
- free_verifier_state(&sl->state, false);
- kfree(sl);
- sl = sln;
- }
+ while (sl) {
+ sln = sl->next;
+ free_verifier_state(&sl->state, false);
+ kfree(sl);
+ sl = sln;
+ }
}
kvfree(env->explored_states);
@@ -8240,7 +8259,7 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr,
goto skip_full_check;
}
- env->explored_states = kvcalloc(env->prog->len,
+ env->explored_states = kvcalloc(state_htab_size(env),
sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_state_list *),
GFP_USER);
ret = -ENOMEM;