diff options
author | Chuck Lever | 2013-10-17 14:13:47 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Trond Myklebust | 2013-10-28 15:30:46 -0400 |
commit | 60ea68129942dc36cd1a3a9bdaec783369ee5a6d (patch) | |
tree | b1eb0c698e34126f85d95ed3ffe17c334d72f455 | |
parent | 8ef2f8d46aca7ff2e7e2b926bb563212aa63a4af (diff) |
NFS: Migration support for RELEASE_LOCKOWNER
Currently the Linux NFS client ignores the operation status code for
the RELEASE_LOCKOWNER operation. Like NFSv3's UMNT operation,
RELEASE_LOCKOWNER is a courtesy to help servers manage their
resources, and the outcome is not consequential for the client.
During a migration, a server may report NFS4ERR_LEASE_MOVED, in
which case the client really should retry, since typically
LEASE_MOVED has nothing to do with the current operation, but does
prevent it from going forward.
Also, it's important for a client to respond as soon as possible to
a moved lease condition, since the client's lease could expire on
the destination without further action by the client.
NFS4ERR_DELAY is not included in the list of valid status codes for
RELEASE_LOCKOWNER in RFC 3530bis. However, rfc3530-migration-update
does permit migration-capable servers to return DELAY to clients,
but only in the context of an ongoing migration. In this case the
server has frozen lock state in preparation for migration, and a
client retry would help the destination server purge unneeded state
once migration recovery is complete.
Interestly, NFS4ERR_MOVED is not valid for RELEASE_LOCKOWNER, even
though lock owners can be migrated with Transparent State Migration.
Note that RFC 3530bis section 9.5 includes RELEASE_LOCKOWNER in the
list of operations that renew a client's lease on the server if they
succeed. Now that our client pays attention to the operation's
status code, we can note that renewal appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-rw-r--r-- | fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 16 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index 2564e1c89f56..9f2ccf7471ee 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -5800,6 +5800,7 @@ struct nfs_release_lockowner_data { struct nfs_release_lockowner_args args; struct nfs4_sequence_args seq_args; struct nfs4_sequence_res seq_res; + unsigned long timestamp; }; static void nfs4_release_lockowner_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata) @@ -5807,12 +5808,27 @@ static void nfs4_release_lockowner_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata struct nfs_release_lockowner_data *data = calldata; nfs40_setup_sequence(data->server, &data->seq_args, &data->seq_res, task); + data->timestamp = jiffies; } static void nfs4_release_lockowner_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata) { struct nfs_release_lockowner_data *data = calldata; + struct nfs_server *server = data->server; + nfs40_sequence_done(task, &data->seq_res); + + switch (task->tk_status) { + case 0: + renew_lease(server, data->timestamp); + break; + case -NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID: + case -NFS4ERR_EXPIRED: + case -NFS4ERR_LEASE_MOVED: + case -NFS4ERR_DELAY: + if (nfs4_async_handle_error(task, server, NULL) == -EAGAIN) + rpc_restart_call_prepare(task); + } } static void nfs4_release_lockowner_release(void *calldata) |