diff options
author | Delyan Kratunov | 2022-06-14 23:10:46 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexei Starovoitov | 2022-06-16 19:27:29 -0700 |
commit | 8c7dcb84e3b744b2b70baa7a44a9b1881c33a9c9 (patch) | |
tree | 05179f5cbd02bd3b8672d6842d14bc6f7ed5d708 | |
parent | d687f621c518d791b5fffde8add3112d869b0b1b (diff) |
bpf: implement sleepable uprobes by chaining gps
uprobes work by raising a trap, setting a task flag from within the
interrupt handler, and processing the actual work for the uprobe on the
way back to userspace. As a result, uprobe handlers already execute in a
might_fault/_sleep context. The primary obstacle to sleepable bpf uprobe
programs is therefore on the bpf side.
Namely, the bpf_prog_array attached to the uprobe is protected by normal
rcu. In order for uprobe bpf programs to become sleepable, it has to be
protected by the tasks_trace rcu flavor instead (and kfree() called after
a corresponding grace period).
Therefore, the free path for bpf_prog_array now chains a tasks_trace and
normal grace periods one after the other.
Users who iterate under tasks_trace read section would
be safe, as would users who iterate under normal read sections (from
non-sleepable locations).
The downside is that the tasks_trace latency affects all perf_event-attached
bpf programs (and not just uprobe ones). This is deemed safe given the
possible attach rates for kprobe/uprobe/tp programs.
Separately, non-sleepable programs need access to dynamically sized
rcu-protected maps, so bpf_run_prog_array_sleepables now conditionally takes
an rcu read section, in addition to the overarching tasks_trace section.
Signed-off-by: Delyan Kratunov <delyank@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ce844d62a2fd0443b08c5ab02e95bc7149f9aeb1.1655248076.git.delyank@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/bpf.h | 52 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/core.c | 15 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 5 |
4 files changed, 71 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 69106ae46464..f3e88afdaffe 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ #include <linux/stddef.h> #include <linux/bpfptr.h> #include <linux/btf.h> +#include <linux/rcupdate_trace.h> struct bpf_verifier_env; struct bpf_verifier_log; @@ -1372,6 +1373,8 @@ extern struct bpf_empty_prog_array bpf_empty_prog_array; struct bpf_prog_array *bpf_prog_array_alloc(u32 prog_cnt, gfp_t flags); void bpf_prog_array_free(struct bpf_prog_array *progs); +/* Use when traversal over the bpf_prog_array uses tasks_trace rcu */ +void bpf_prog_array_free_sleepable(struct bpf_prog_array *progs); int bpf_prog_array_length(struct bpf_prog_array *progs); bool bpf_prog_array_is_empty(struct bpf_prog_array *array); int bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user(struct bpf_prog_array *progs, @@ -1463,6 +1466,55 @@ bpf_prog_run_array(const struct bpf_prog_array *array, return ret; } +/* Notes on RCU design for bpf_prog_arrays containing sleepable programs: + * + * We use the tasks_trace rcu flavor read section to protect the bpf_prog_array + * overall. As a result, we must use the bpf_prog_array_free_sleepable + * in order to use the tasks_trace rcu grace period. + * + * When a non-sleepable program is inside the array, we take the rcu read + * section and disable preemption for that program alone, so it can access + * rcu-protected dynamically sized maps. + */ +static __always_inline u32 +bpf_prog_run_array_sleepable(const struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *array_rcu, + const void *ctx, bpf_prog_run_fn run_prog) +{ + const struct bpf_prog_array_item *item; + const struct bpf_prog *prog; + const struct bpf_prog_array *array; + struct bpf_run_ctx *old_run_ctx; + struct bpf_trace_run_ctx run_ctx; + u32 ret = 1; + + might_fault(); + + rcu_read_lock_trace(); + migrate_disable(); + + array = rcu_dereference_check(array_rcu, rcu_read_lock_trace_held()); + if (unlikely(!array)) + goto out; + old_run_ctx = bpf_set_run_ctx(&run_ctx.run_ctx); + item = &array->items[0]; + while ((prog = READ_ONCE(item->prog))) { + if (!prog->aux->sleepable) + rcu_read_lock(); + + run_ctx.bpf_cookie = item->bpf_cookie; + ret &= run_prog(prog, ctx); + item++; + + if (!prog->aux->sleepable) + rcu_read_unlock(); + } + bpf_reset_run_ctx(old_run_ctx); +out: + migrate_enable(); + rcu_read_unlock_trace(); + return ret; +} + #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_prog_active); extern struct mutex bpf_stats_enabled_mutex; diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index e78cc5eea4a5..b5ffebcce6cc 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -2279,6 +2279,21 @@ void bpf_prog_array_free(struct bpf_prog_array *progs) kfree_rcu(progs, rcu); } +static void __bpf_prog_array_free_sleepable_cb(struct rcu_head *rcu) +{ + struct bpf_prog_array *progs; + + progs = container_of(rcu, struct bpf_prog_array, rcu); + kfree_rcu(progs, rcu); +} + +void bpf_prog_array_free_sleepable(struct bpf_prog_array *progs) +{ + if (!progs || progs == &bpf_empty_prog_array.hdr) + return; + call_rcu_tasks_trace(&progs->rcu, __bpf_prog_array_free_sleepable_cb); +} + int bpf_prog_array_length(struct bpf_prog_array *array) { struct bpf_prog_array_item *item; diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c index 10b157a6d73e..d1c22594dbf9 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c @@ -1936,7 +1936,7 @@ int perf_event_attach_bpf_prog(struct perf_event *event, event->prog = prog; event->bpf_cookie = bpf_cookie; rcu_assign_pointer(event->tp_event->prog_array, new_array); - bpf_prog_array_free(old_array); + bpf_prog_array_free_sleepable(old_array); unlock: mutex_unlock(&bpf_event_mutex); @@ -1962,7 +1962,7 @@ void perf_event_detach_bpf_prog(struct perf_event *event) bpf_prog_array_delete_safe(old_array, event->prog); } else { rcu_assign_pointer(event->tp_event->prog_array, new_array); - bpf_prog_array_free(old_array); + bpf_prog_array_free_sleepable(old_array); } bpf_prog_put(event->prog); diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c index 9711589273cd..0282c119b1b2 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include <linux/namei.h> #include <linux/string.h> #include <linux/rculist.h> +#include <linux/filter.h> #include "trace_dynevent.h" #include "trace_probe.h" @@ -1346,9 +1347,7 @@ static void __uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, if (bpf_prog_array_valid(call)) { u32 ret; - preempt_disable(); - ret = trace_call_bpf(call, regs); - preempt_enable(); + ret = bpf_prog_run_array_sleepable(call->prog_array, regs, bpf_prog_run); if (!ret) return; } |