diff options
| author | Jens Axboe | 2021-03-02 17:22:11 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jens Axboe | 2021-03-02 17:22:11 -0700 |
| commit | f5f4fc4649ae542b1a25670b17aaf3cbb6187acc (patch) | |
| tree | a859d8a170185780f4ed82033c4d66f29b32134c | |
| parent | 7a7fd0de4a9804299793e564a555a49c1fc924cb (diff) | |
ia64: don't call handle_signal() unless there's actually a signal queued
Sergei and John both reported that ia64 failed to boot in 5.11, and it
was related to signals. Turns out the ia64 signal handling is a bit odd,
it doesn't check the return value of get_signal() for whether there's a
signal to deliver or not. With the introduction of TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL,
then task_work could trigger it.
Fix it by only calling handle_signal() if we actually have a real signal
to deliver. This brings it in line with all other archs, too.
Fixes: b269c229b0e8 ("ia64: add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL")
Reported-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@gmail.com>
Reported-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Tested-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c index e67b22fc3c60..c1b299760bf7 100644 --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c @@ -341,7 +341,8 @@ ia64_do_signal (struct sigscratch *scr, long in_syscall) * need to push through a forced SIGSEGV. */ while (1) { - get_signal(&ksig); + if (!get_signal(&ksig)) + break; /* * get_signal() may have run a debugger (via notify_parent()) |