diff options
author | Damien Le Moal | 2022-06-09 11:24:55 +0900 |
---|---|---|
committer | Martin K. Petersen | 2022-06-10 13:08:06 -0400 |
commit | 44f2bfe9ef082f76184d4a048c995729d14ec45d (patch) | |
tree | b264450c2813278fddde3d086f0a689d865001df | |
parent | c3752f44604f3bc4f3ce6e169fa32d16943ff70b (diff) |
scsi: libsas: Introduce struct smp_rg_resp
When compiling with gcc 12, several warnings are thrown by gcc when
compiling drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c, e.g.:
In function ‘sas_get_ex_change_count’,
inlined from ‘sas_find_bcast_dev’ at
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c:1816:8:
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c:1781:20: warning: array subscript
‘struct smp_resp[0]’ is partly outside array bounds of ‘unsigned
char[32]’ [-Warray-bounds]
1781 | if (rg_resp->result != SMP_RESP_FUNC_ACC) {
| ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~
This is due to the use of the struct smp_resp to aggregate all possible
response types using a union but allocating a response buffer with a size
exactly equal to the size of the response type needed. This leads to access
to fields of struct smp_resp from an allocated memory area that is smaller
than the size of struct smp_resp.
Fix this by defining struct smp_rg_resp for sas report general responses.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220609022456.409087-3-damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com
Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 31 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | include/scsi/sas.h | 8 |
2 files changed, 21 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c index fb998a8a7d3b..78a38980636e 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c @@ -429,27 +429,14 @@ static int sas_expander_discover(struct domain_device *dev) #define MAX_EXPANDER_PHYS 128 -static void ex_assign_report_general(struct domain_device *dev, - struct smp_resp *resp) -{ - struct report_general_resp *rg = &resp->rg; - - dev->ex_dev.ex_change_count = be16_to_cpu(rg->change_count); - dev->ex_dev.max_route_indexes = be16_to_cpu(rg->route_indexes); - dev->ex_dev.num_phys = min(rg->num_phys, (u8)MAX_EXPANDER_PHYS); - dev->ex_dev.t2t_supp = rg->t2t_supp; - dev->ex_dev.conf_route_table = rg->conf_route_table; - dev->ex_dev.configuring = rg->configuring; - memcpy(dev->ex_dev.enclosure_logical_id, rg->enclosure_logical_id, 8); -} - #define RG_REQ_SIZE 8 -#define RG_RESP_SIZE 32 +#define RG_RESP_SIZE sizeof(struct smp_rg_resp) static int sas_ex_general(struct domain_device *dev) { u8 *rg_req; - struct smp_resp *rg_resp; + struct smp_rg_resp *rg_resp; + struct report_general_resp *rg; int res; int i; @@ -480,7 +467,15 @@ static int sas_ex_general(struct domain_device *dev) goto out; } - ex_assign_report_general(dev, rg_resp); + rg = &rg_resp->rg; + dev->ex_dev.ex_change_count = be16_to_cpu(rg->change_count); + dev->ex_dev.max_route_indexes = be16_to_cpu(rg->route_indexes); + dev->ex_dev.num_phys = min(rg->num_phys, (u8)MAX_EXPANDER_PHYS); + dev->ex_dev.t2t_supp = rg->t2t_supp; + dev->ex_dev.conf_route_table = rg->conf_route_table; + dev->ex_dev.configuring = rg->configuring; + memcpy(dev->ex_dev.enclosure_logical_id, + rg->enclosure_logical_id, 8); if (dev->ex_dev.configuring) { pr_debug("RG: ex %016llx self-configuring...\n", @@ -1756,7 +1751,7 @@ static int sas_get_ex_change_count(struct domain_device *dev, int *ecc) { int res; u8 *rg_req; - struct smp_resp *rg_resp; + struct smp_rg_resp *rg_resp; rg_req = alloc_smp_req(RG_REQ_SIZE); if (!rg_req) diff --git a/include/scsi/sas.h b/include/scsi/sas.h index b3ee9bd63277..a8f9743ed6fc 100644 --- a/include/scsi/sas.h +++ b/include/scsi/sas.h @@ -696,6 +696,14 @@ struct report_phy_sata_resp { #error "Bitfield order not defined!" #endif +struct smp_rg_resp { + u8 frame_type; + u8 function; + u8 result; + u8 reserved; + struct report_general_resp rg; +} __attribute__ ((packed)); + struct smp_disc_resp { u8 frame_type; u8 function; |