aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDamien Le Moal2022-06-09 11:24:55 +0900
committerMartin K. Petersen2022-06-10 13:08:06 -0400
commit44f2bfe9ef082f76184d4a048c995729d14ec45d (patch)
treeb264450c2813278fddde3d086f0a689d865001df
parentc3752f44604f3bc4f3ce6e169fa32d16943ff70b (diff)
scsi: libsas: Introduce struct smp_rg_resp
When compiling with gcc 12, several warnings are thrown by gcc when compiling drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c, e.g.: In function ‘sas_get_ex_change_count’, inlined from ‘sas_find_bcast_dev’ at drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c:1816:8: drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c:1781:20: warning: array subscript ‘struct smp_resp[0]’ is partly outside array bounds of ‘unsigned char[32]’ [-Warray-bounds] 1781 | if (rg_resp->result != SMP_RESP_FUNC_ACC) { | ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~ This is due to the use of the struct smp_resp to aggregate all possible response types using a union but allocating a response buffer with a size exactly equal to the size of the response type needed. This leads to access to fields of struct smp_resp from an allocated memory area that is smaller than the size of struct smp_resp. Fix this by defining struct smp_rg_resp for sas report general responses. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220609022456.409087-3-damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
-rw-r--r--drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c31
-rw-r--r--include/scsi/sas.h8
2 files changed, 21 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
index fb998a8a7d3b..78a38980636e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
@@ -429,27 +429,14 @@ static int sas_expander_discover(struct domain_device *dev)
#define MAX_EXPANDER_PHYS 128
-static void ex_assign_report_general(struct domain_device *dev,
- struct smp_resp *resp)
-{
- struct report_general_resp *rg = &resp->rg;
-
- dev->ex_dev.ex_change_count = be16_to_cpu(rg->change_count);
- dev->ex_dev.max_route_indexes = be16_to_cpu(rg->route_indexes);
- dev->ex_dev.num_phys = min(rg->num_phys, (u8)MAX_EXPANDER_PHYS);
- dev->ex_dev.t2t_supp = rg->t2t_supp;
- dev->ex_dev.conf_route_table = rg->conf_route_table;
- dev->ex_dev.configuring = rg->configuring;
- memcpy(dev->ex_dev.enclosure_logical_id, rg->enclosure_logical_id, 8);
-}
-
#define RG_REQ_SIZE 8
-#define RG_RESP_SIZE 32
+#define RG_RESP_SIZE sizeof(struct smp_rg_resp)
static int sas_ex_general(struct domain_device *dev)
{
u8 *rg_req;
- struct smp_resp *rg_resp;
+ struct smp_rg_resp *rg_resp;
+ struct report_general_resp *rg;
int res;
int i;
@@ -480,7 +467,15 @@ static int sas_ex_general(struct domain_device *dev)
goto out;
}
- ex_assign_report_general(dev, rg_resp);
+ rg = &rg_resp->rg;
+ dev->ex_dev.ex_change_count = be16_to_cpu(rg->change_count);
+ dev->ex_dev.max_route_indexes = be16_to_cpu(rg->route_indexes);
+ dev->ex_dev.num_phys = min(rg->num_phys, (u8)MAX_EXPANDER_PHYS);
+ dev->ex_dev.t2t_supp = rg->t2t_supp;
+ dev->ex_dev.conf_route_table = rg->conf_route_table;
+ dev->ex_dev.configuring = rg->configuring;
+ memcpy(dev->ex_dev.enclosure_logical_id,
+ rg->enclosure_logical_id, 8);
if (dev->ex_dev.configuring) {
pr_debug("RG: ex %016llx self-configuring...\n",
@@ -1756,7 +1751,7 @@ static int sas_get_ex_change_count(struct domain_device *dev, int *ecc)
{
int res;
u8 *rg_req;
- struct smp_resp *rg_resp;
+ struct smp_rg_resp *rg_resp;
rg_req = alloc_smp_req(RG_REQ_SIZE);
if (!rg_req)
diff --git a/include/scsi/sas.h b/include/scsi/sas.h
index b3ee9bd63277..a8f9743ed6fc 100644
--- a/include/scsi/sas.h
+++ b/include/scsi/sas.h
@@ -696,6 +696,14 @@ struct report_phy_sata_resp {
#error "Bitfield order not defined!"
#endif
+struct smp_rg_resp {
+ u8 frame_type;
+ u8 function;
+ u8 result;
+ u8 reserved;
+ struct report_general_resp rg;
+} __attribute__ ((packed));
+
struct smp_disc_resp {
u8 frame_type;
u8 function;