diff options
author | Andrew Morton | 2007-06-08 13:46:45 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds | 2007-06-08 17:23:32 -0700 |
commit | 0f44cd23a5a2e26191a28ab6e91bd0c7849c8e0f (patch) | |
tree | 7cb971c18e4bf6784ea0ca1826fdb425effbeba9 /Documentation/SubmittingPatches | |
parent | a47653fc2643cf61bcabba8c9ff5c45517c089ba (diff) |
document Acked-by:
Explain what we use Acked-by: for, and how it differs from Signed-off-by:
Acked-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/SubmittingPatches')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 26 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches index d91125ab6f49..0958e97d4bf4 100644 --- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches +++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches @@ -340,8 +340,32 @@ now, but you can do this to mark internal company procedures or just point out some special detail about the sign-off. +13) When to use Acked-by: -13) The canonical patch format +The Signed-off-by: tag indicates that the signer was involved in the +development of the patch, or that he/she was in the patch's delivery path. + +If a person was not directly involved in the preparation or handling of a +patch but wishes to signify and record their approval of it then they can +arrange to have an Acked-by: line added to the patch's changelog. + +Acked-by: is often used by the maintainer of the affected code when that +maintainer neither contributed to nor forwarded the patch. + +Acked-by: is not as formal as Signed-off-by:. It is a record that the acker +has at least reviewed the patch and has indicated acceptance. Hence patch +mergers will sometimes manually convert an acker's "yep, looks good to me" +into an Acked-by:. + +Acked-by: does not necessarily indicate acknowledgement of the entire patch. +For example, if a patch affects multiple subsystems and has an Acked-by: from +one subsystem maintainer then this usually indicates acknowledgement of just +the part which affects that maintainer's code. Judgement should be used here. + When in doubt people should refer to the original discussion in the mailing +list archives. + + +14) The canonical patch format The canonical patch subject line is: |