diff options
author | Bjorn Helgaas | 2020-01-17 10:18:22 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Masahiro Yamada | 2020-01-22 00:54:35 +0900 |
commit | 2b5072b9dfab1bc9e4f605bba19b4470e429c60c (patch) | |
tree | d9aac4322591d45702361f2c0de89b55514db9f4 /Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst | |
parent | ba82f52e2287f55ae10f4123980198b6ea8a8dc6 (diff) |
kconfig: fix documentation typos
Fix a couple typos in kconfig-language documentation.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst | 7 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst index 231e6a64957f..d0111dd26410 100644 --- a/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst @@ -591,7 +591,8 @@ The two different resolutions for b) can be tested in the sample Kconfig file Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-02. Below is a list of examples of prior fixes for these types of recursive issues; -all errors appear to involve one or more select's and one or more "depends on". +all errors appear to involve one or more "select" statements and one or more +"depends on". ============ =================================== commit fix @@ -653,7 +654,7 @@ the use of the xconfig configurator [1]_. Work should be done to confirm if the deduced semantics matches our intended Kconfig design goals. Having well defined semantics can be useful for tools for practical -evaluation of depenencies, for instance one such use known case was work to +evaluation of dependencies, for instance one such case was work to express in boolean abstraction of the inferred semantics of Kconfig to translate Kconfig logic into boolean formulas and run a SAT solver on this to find dead code / features (always inactive), 114 dead features were found in @@ -680,7 +681,7 @@ abstraction the inferred semantics of Kconfig to translate Kconfig logic into boolean formulas and run a SAT solver on it [5]_. Another known related project is CADOS [6]_ (former VAMOS [7]_) and the tools, mainly undertaker [8]_, which has been introduced first with [9]_. The basic concept of undertaker is to -exract variability models from Kconfig, and put them together with a +extract variability models from Kconfig and put them together with a propositional formula extracted from CPP #ifdefs and build-rules into a SAT solver in order to find dead code, dead files, and dead symbols. If using a SAT solver is desirable on Kconfig one approach would be to evaluate repurposing |