aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/process
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKrzysztof Kozlowski2022-04-02 12:07:06 +0200
committerJonathan Corbet2022-04-05 09:15:29 -0600
commit0c603a5c704fcfead5e85e4c89c297d2be68b671 (patch)
tree61c797aadd7126cfbbe162ffc14396fb7bf9c350 /Documentation/process
parent3123109284176b1532874591f7c81f3837bbdc17 (diff)
Documentation/process: mention patch changelog in review process
Extend the "Respond to review comments" section of "Submitting patches" with reference to patch changelogs. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/process')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst5
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
index fb496b2ebfd3..9bb4e8c0f635 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
@@ -318,7 +318,10 @@ understands what is going on.
Be sure to tell the reviewers what changes you are making and to thank them
for their time. Code review is a tiring and time-consuming process, and
reviewers sometimes get grumpy. Even in that case, though, respond
-politely and address the problems they have pointed out.
+politely and address the problems they have pointed out. When sending a next
+version, add a ``patch changelog`` to the cover letter or to individual patches
+explaining difference aganst previous submission (see
+:ref:`the_canonical_patch_format`).
See Documentation/process/email-clients.rst for recommendations on email
clients and mailing list etiquette.