diff options
| author | KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki | 2009-06-17 16:27:19 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds | 2009-06-18 13:03:48 -0700 |
| commit | 22a668d7c3ef833e7d67e9cef587ecc78069d532 (patch) | |
| tree | da9f2e7ea7224c347dfe33ea9d4dddd944c861ac /Documentation | |
| parent | 8a9478ca7f4bcb8945cec7f95d52dae2d5e50cbd (diff) | |
memcg: fix behavior under memory.limit equals to memsw.limit
A user can set memcg.limit_in_bytes == memcg.memsw.limit_in_bytes when the
user just want to limit the total size of applications, in other words,
not very interested in memory usage itself. In this case, swap-out will
be done only by global-LRU.
But, under current implementation, memory.limit_in_bytes is checked at
first and try_to_free_page() may do swap-out. But, that swap-out is
useless for memsw.limit_in_bytes and the thread may hit limit again.
This patch tries to fix the current behavior at memory.limit ==
memsw.limit case. And documentation is updated to explain the behavior of
this special case.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt | 17 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt index 1a608877b14e..af48135bd9b8 100644 --- a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt +++ b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt @@ -152,14 +152,19 @@ When swap is accounted, following files are added. usage of mem+swap is limited by memsw.limit_in_bytes. -Note: why 'mem+swap' rather than swap. +* why 'mem+swap' rather than swap. The global LRU(kswapd) can swap out arbitrary pages. Swap-out means to move account from memory to swap...there is no change in usage of -mem+swap. - -In other words, when we want to limit the usage of swap without affecting -global LRU, mem+swap limit is better than just limiting swap from OS point -of view. +mem+swap. In other words, when we want to limit the usage of swap without +affecting global LRU, mem+swap limit is better than just limiting swap from +OS point of view. + +* What happens when a cgroup hits memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes +When a cgroup his memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes, it's useless to do swap-out +in this cgroup. Then, swap-out will not be done by cgroup routine and file +caches are dropped. But as mentioned above, global LRU can do swapout memory +from it for sanity of the system's memory management state. You can't forbid +it by cgroup. 2.5 Reclaim |