diff options
| author | Jakub Kicinski | 2021-08-03 16:14:15 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller | 2021-08-04 12:43:27 +0100 |
| commit | 396492b4c5f249f616002bb5de787d060d2b2974 (patch) | |
| tree | 86c52b2fbd7023feab9b1549b026956978356908 /Documentation | |
| parent | d00551b402015c519d19e1535bf2b5398854b0dd (diff) | |
docs: networking: netdevsim rules
There are aspects of netdevsim which are commonly
misunderstood and pointed out in review. Cong
suggest we document them.
Suggested-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst | 17 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst b/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst index 91b2cf712801..e26532f49760 100644 --- a/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst +++ b/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst @@ -228,6 +228,23 @@ before posting to the mailing list. The patchwork build bot instance gets overloaded very easily and netdev@vger really doesn't need more traffic if we can help it. +netdevsim is great, can I extend it for my out-of-tree tests? +------------------------------------------------------------- + +No, `netdevsim` is a test vehicle solely for upstream tests. +(Please add your tests under tools/testing/selftests/.) + +We also give no guarantees that `netdevsim` won't change in the future +in a way which would break what would normally be considered uAPI. + +Is netdevsim considered a "user" of an API? +------------------------------------------- + +Linux kernel has a long standing rule that no API should be added unless +it has a real, in-tree user. Mock-ups and tests based on `netdevsim` are +strongly encouraged when adding new APIs, but `netdevsim` in itself +is **not** considered a use case/user. + Any other tips to help ensure my net/net-next patch gets OK'd? -------------------------------------------------------------- Attention to detail. Re-read your own work as if you were the |