diff options
| author | WANG Cong | 2011-11-02 13:39:25 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds | 2011-11-02 16:07:02 -0700 |
| commit | c736de60aed869df8a9aba512cdaf89e32545b00 (patch) | |
| tree | 09397ad20f12fd5d97b1e4e6b46df617b0971982 /Documentation | |
| parent | f1ecf06854a66ee663f4d4cf029c78cd62a15e04 (diff) | |
sysctl: make CONFIG_SYSCTL_SYSCALL default to n
When I tried to send a patch to remove it, Andi told me we still need to
keep compabitlies for old libc, so we can't remove this completely. Then
just make it default to n and remove the doc from
feature-removal-schedule.txt.
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 35 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 35 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt index 7c799fc5b88e..3d849122b5b1 100644 --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt @@ -133,41 +133,6 @@ Who: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> --------------------------- -What: sys_sysctl -When: September 2010 -Option: CONFIG_SYSCTL_SYSCALL -Why: The same information is available in a more convenient from - /proc/sys, and none of the sysctl variables appear to be - important performance wise. - - Binary sysctls are a long standing source of subtle kernel - bugs and security issues. - - When I looked several months ago all I could find after - searching several distributions were 5 user space programs and - glibc (which falls back to /proc/sys) using this syscall. - - The man page for sysctl(2) documents it as unusable for user - space programs. - - sysctl(2) is not generally ABI compatible to a 32bit user - space application on a 64bit and a 32bit kernel. - - For the last several months the policy has been no new binary - sysctls and no one has put forward an argument to use them. - - Binary sysctls issues seem to keep happening appearing so - properly deprecating them (with a warning to user space) and a - 2 year grace warning period will mean eventually we can kill - them and end the pain. - - In the mean time individual binary sysctls can be dealt with - in a piecewise fashion. - -Who: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> - ---------------------------- - What: /proc/<pid>/oom_adj When: August 2012 Why: /proc/<pid>/oom_adj allows userspace to influence the oom killer's |