diff options
author | Conor Dooley | 2023-03-03 14:37:55 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman | 2023-03-17 08:50:29 +0100 |
commit | 0a6321657eb82d6090391aa96804e4f712acb87d (patch) | |
tree | 31c856b9dc94c65915734b6650a0507045fc9dd1 /arch/riscv/kernel | |
parent | 324912d6c0c4006711054d389faa2239c1655e1e (diff) |
RISC-V: Don't check text_mutex during stop_machine
[ Upstream commit 2a8db5ec4a28a0fce822d10224db9471a44b6925 ]
We're currently using stop_machine() to update ftrace & kprobes, which
means that the thread that takes text_mutex during may not be the same
as the thread that eventually patches the code. This isn't actually a
race because the lock is still held (preventing any other concurrent
accesses) and there is only one thread running during stop_machine(),
but it does trigger a lockdep failure.
This patch just elides the lockdep check during stop_machine.
Fixes: c15ac4fd60d5 ("riscv/ftrace: Add dynamic function tracer support")
Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Reported-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303143754.4005217-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/riscv/kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c | 13 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c | 28 |
2 files changed, 36 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c index 5bff37af4770..03a6434a8cdd 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c @@ -15,10 +15,19 @@ void ftrace_arch_code_modify_prepare(void) __acquires(&text_mutex) { mutex_lock(&text_mutex); + + /* + * The code sequences we use for ftrace can't be patched while the + * kernel is running, so we need to use stop_machine() to modify them + * for now. This doesn't play nice with text_mutex, we use this flag + * to elide the check. + */ + riscv_patch_in_stop_machine = true; } void ftrace_arch_code_modify_post_process(void) __releases(&text_mutex) { + riscv_patch_in_stop_machine = false; mutex_unlock(&text_mutex); } @@ -107,9 +116,9 @@ int ftrace_init_nop(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec) { int out; - ftrace_arch_code_modify_prepare(); + mutex_lock(&text_mutex); out = ftrace_make_nop(mod, rec, MCOUNT_ADDR); - ftrace_arch_code_modify_post_process(); + mutex_unlock(&text_mutex); return out; } diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c index 765004b60513..e099961453cc 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ #include <asm/kprobes.h> #include <asm/cacheflush.h> #include <asm/fixmap.h> +#include <asm/ftrace.h> #include <asm/patch.h> struct patch_insn { @@ -19,6 +20,8 @@ struct patch_insn { atomic_t cpu_count; }; +int riscv_patch_in_stop_machine = false; + #ifdef CONFIG_MMU /* * The fix_to_virt(, idx) needs a const value (not a dynamic variable of @@ -59,8 +62,15 @@ static int patch_insn_write(void *addr, const void *insn, size_t len) * Before reaching here, it was expected to lock the text_mutex * already, so we don't need to give another lock here and could * ensure that it was safe between each cores. + * + * We're currently using stop_machine() for ftrace & kprobes, and while + * that ensures text_mutex is held before installing the mappings it + * does not ensure text_mutex is held by the calling thread. That's + * safe but triggers a lockdep failure, so just elide it for that + * specific case. */ - lockdep_assert_held(&text_mutex); + if (!riscv_patch_in_stop_machine) + lockdep_assert_held(&text_mutex); if (across_pages) patch_map(addr + len, FIX_TEXT_POKE1); @@ -121,13 +131,25 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_text_cb); int patch_text(void *addr, u32 insn) { + int ret; struct patch_insn patch = { .addr = addr, .insn = insn, .cpu_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0), }; - return stop_machine_cpuslocked(patch_text_cb, - &patch, cpu_online_mask); + /* + * kprobes takes text_mutex, before calling patch_text(), but as we call + * calls stop_machine(), the lockdep assertion in patch_insn_write() + * gets confused by the context in which the lock is taken. + * Instead, ensure the lock is held before calling stop_machine(), and + * set riscv_patch_in_stop_machine to skip the check in + * patch_insn_write(). + */ + lockdep_assert_held(&text_mutex); + riscv_patch_in_stop_machine = true; + ret = stop_machine_cpuslocked(patch_text_cb, &patch, cpu_online_mask); + riscv_patch_in_stop_machine = false; + return ret; } NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_text); |