KVM: s390: wire up bpb feature

The new firmware interfaces for branch prediction behaviour changes
are transparently available for the guest. Nevertheless, there is
new state attached that should be migrated and properly resetted.
Provide a mechanism for handling reset, migration and VSIE.

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
[Changed capability number to 152. - Radim]
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>

2 files changed, 22 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 2c93cbbcd15e..2598cf243b86 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -421,6 +421,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
 	case KVM_CAP_S390_GS:
 		r = test_facility(133);
 		break;
+	case KVM_CAP_S390_BPB:
+		r = test_facility(82);
+		break;
 	default:
 		r = 0;
 	}
@@ -2198,6 +2201,8 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	kvm_s390_set_prefix(vcpu, 0);
 	if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 64))
 		vcpu->run->kvm_valid_regs |= KVM_SYNC_RICCB;
+	if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 82))
+		vcpu->run->kvm_valid_regs |= KVM_SYNC_BPBC;
 	if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 133))
 		vcpu->run->kvm_valid_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GSCB;
 	/* fprs can be synchronized via vrs, even if the guest has no vx. With
@@ -2339,6 +2344,7 @@ static void kvm_s390_vcpu_initial_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	current->thread.fpu.fpc = 0;
 	vcpu->arch.sie_block->gbea = 1;
 	vcpu->arch.sie_block->pp = 0;
+	vcpu->arch.sie_block->fpf &= ~FPF_BPBC;
 	vcpu->arch.pfault_token = KVM_S390_PFAULT_TOKEN_INVALID;
 	kvm_clear_async_pf_completion_queue(vcpu);
 	if (!kvm_s390_user_cpu_state_ctrl(vcpu->kvm))
@@ -3298,6 +3304,11 @@ static void sync_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
 		vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecd |= ECD_HOSTREGMGMT;
 		vcpu->arch.gs_enabled = 1;
 	}
+	if ((kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_BPBC) &&
+	    test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 82)) {
+		vcpu->arch.sie_block->fpf &= ~FPF_BPBC;
+		vcpu->arch.sie_block->fpf |= kvm_run->s.regs.bpbc ? FPF_BPBC : 0;
+	}
 	save_access_regs(vcpu->arch.host_acrs);
 	restore_access_regs(vcpu->run->s.regs.acrs);
 	/* save host (userspace) fprs/vrs */
@@ -3344,6 +3355,7 @@ static void store_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
 	kvm_run->s.regs.pft = vcpu->arch.pfault_token;
 	kvm_run->s.regs.pfs = vcpu->arch.pfault_select;
 	kvm_run->s.regs.pfc = vcpu->arch.pfault_compare;
+	kvm_run->s.regs.bpbc = (vcpu->arch.sie_block->fpf & FPF_BPBC) == FPF_BPBC;
 	save_access_regs(vcpu->run->s.regs.acrs);
 	restore_access_regs(vcpu->arch.host_acrs);
 	/* Save guest register state */
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
index 5d6ae0326d9e..751348348477 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
@@ -223,6 +223,12 @@ static void unshadow_scb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
 	memcpy(scb_o->gcr, scb_s->gcr, 128);
 	scb_o->pp = scb_s->pp;
 
+	/* branch prediction */
+	if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 82)) {
+		scb_o->fpf &= ~FPF_BPBC;
+		scb_o->fpf |= scb_s->fpf & FPF_BPBC;
+	}
+
 	/* interrupt intercept */
 	switch (scb_s->icptcode) {
 	case ICPT_PROGI:
@@ -265,6 +271,7 @@ static int shadow_scb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
 	scb_s->ecb3 = 0;
 	scb_s->ecd = 0;
 	scb_s->fac = 0;
+	scb_s->fpf = 0;
 
 	rc = prepare_cpuflags(vcpu, vsie_page);
 	if (rc)
@@ -324,6 +331,9 @@ static int shadow_scb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
 			prefix_unmapped(vsie_page);
 		scb_s->ecb |= scb_o->ecb & ECB_TE;
 	}
+	/* branch prediction */
+	if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 82))
+		scb_s->fpf |= scb_o->fpf & FPF_BPBC;
 	/* SIMD */
 	if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 129)) {
 		scb_s->eca |= scb_o->eca & ECA_VX;