[PATCH] uml: SIGWINCH handling cleanup

Code cleanup - unregister_winch and winch_cleanup had some duplicate code.
This is now abstracted out into free_winch.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 24 insertions, 30 deletions

diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/line.c b/arch/um/drivers/line.c
index a3c39373adb9..46ceb25a9959 100644
--- a/arch/um/drivers/line.c
+++ b/arch/um/drivers/line.c
@@ -774,55 +774,49 @@ void register_winch_irq(int fd, int tty_fd, int pid, struct tty_struct *tty)
 		printk("register_winch_irq - failed to register IRQ\n");
 }
 
+static void free_winch(struct winch *winch)
+{
+	list_del(&winch->list);
+
+	if(winch->pid != -1)
+		os_kill_process(winch->pid, 1);
+	if(winch->fd != -1)
+		os_close_file(winch->fd);
+
+	free_irq(WINCH_IRQ, winch);
+	kfree(winch);
+}
+
 static void unregister_winch(struct tty_struct *tty)
 {
 	struct list_head *ele;
-	struct winch *winch, *found = NULL;
+	struct winch *winch;
 
 	spin_lock(&winch_handler_lock);
+
 	list_for_each(ele, &winch_handlers){
 		winch = list_entry(ele, struct winch, list);
                 if(winch->tty == tty){
-                        found = winch;
-                        break;
+			free_winch(winch);
+			break;
                 }
         }
-        if(found == NULL)
-		goto err;
-
-	list_del(&winch->list);
-	spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock);
-
-        if(winch->pid != -1)
-                os_kill_process(winch->pid, 1);
-
-        free_irq(WINCH_IRQ, winch);
-        kfree(winch);
-
-	return;
-err:
 	spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock);
 }
 
-/* XXX: No lock as it's an exitcall... is this valid? Depending on cleanup
- * order... are we sure that nothing else is done on the list? */
 static void winch_cleanup(void)
 {
-	struct list_head *ele;
+	struct list_head *ele, *next;
 	struct winch *winch;
 
-	list_for_each(ele, &winch_handlers){
+	spin_lock(&winch_handler_lock);
+
+	list_for_each_safe(ele, next, &winch_handlers){
 		winch = list_entry(ele, struct winch, list);
-		if(winch->fd != -1){
-			/* Why is this different from the above free_irq(),
-			 * which deactivates SIGIO? This searches the FD
-			 * somewhere else and removes it from the list... */
-			deactivate_fd(winch->fd, WINCH_IRQ);
-			os_close_file(winch->fd);
-		}
-		if(winch->pid != -1)
-			os_kill_process(winch->pid, 1);
+		free_winch(winch);
 	}
+
+	spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock);
 }
 __uml_exitcall(winch_cleanup);