diff options
| author | Kashyap Desai | 2020-08-19 23:20:28 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jens Axboe | 2020-09-03 15:20:47 -0600 |
| commit | b445547ec1bbd3e7bf4b1c142550942f70527d95 (patch) | |
| tree | 452adb8f18969cd32966206e046632f1d7ff9b44 /block/mq-deadline.c | |
| parent | f1b49fdc1c64db110aa1315831e5fe0f8599fa56 (diff) | |
blk-mq, elevator: Count requests per hctx to improve performance
High CPU utilization on "native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath" due to lock
contention is possible for mq-deadline and bfq IO schedulers
when nr_hw_queues is more than one.
It is because kblockd work queue can submit IO from all online CPUs
(through blk_mq_run_hw_queues()) even though only one hctx has pending
commands.
The elevator callback .has_work for mq-deadline and bfq scheduler considers
pending work if there are any IOs on request queue but it does not account
hctx context.
Add a per-hctx 'elevator_queued' count to the hctx to avoid triggering
the elevator even though there are no requests queued.
[jpg: Relocated atomic_dec() in dd_dispatch_request(), update commit message per Kashyap]
Signed-off-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Diffstat (limited to 'block/mq-deadline.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | block/mq-deadline.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/block/mq-deadline.c b/block/mq-deadline.c index b57470e154c8..800ac902809b 100644 --- a/block/mq-deadline.c +++ b/block/mq-deadline.c @@ -386,6 +386,8 @@ static struct request *dd_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) spin_lock(&dd->lock); rq = __dd_dispatch_request(dd); spin_unlock(&dd->lock); + if (rq) + atomic_dec(&rq->mq_hctx->elevator_queued); return rq; } @@ -533,6 +535,7 @@ static void dd_insert_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, rq = list_first_entry(list, struct request, queuelist); list_del_init(&rq->queuelist); dd_insert_request(hctx, rq, at_head); + atomic_inc(&hctx->elevator_queued); } spin_unlock(&dd->lock); } @@ -579,6 +582,9 @@ static bool dd_has_work(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) { struct deadline_data *dd = hctx->queue->elevator->elevator_data; + if (!atomic_read(&hctx->elevator_queued)) + return false; + return !list_empty_careful(&dd->dispatch) || !list_empty_careful(&dd->fifo_list[0]) || !list_empty_careful(&dd->fifo_list[1]); |