diff options
author | Paolo Valente | 2020-02-03 11:40:54 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jens Axboe | 2020-02-03 06:58:14 -0700 |
commit | f718b093277df582fbf8775548a4f163e664d282 (patch) | |
tree | 2536f43e3c22ff201630e1561c928c465d13e466 /block | |
parent | 49d08d596e85f39ded48e85df362827cbab1f5ae (diff) |
block, bfq: do not plug I/O for bfq_queues with no proc refs
Commit 478de3380c1c ("block, bfq: deschedule empty bfq_queues not
referred by any process") fixed commit 3726112ec731 ("block, bfq:
re-schedule empty queues if they deserve I/O plugging") by
descheduling an empty bfq_queue when it remains with not process
reference. Yet, this still left a case uncovered: an empty bfq_queue
with not process reference that remains in service. This happens for
an in-service sync bfq_queue that is deemed to deserve I/O-dispatch
plugging when it remains empty. Yet no new requests will arrive for
such a bfq_queue if no process sends requests to it any longer. Even
worse, the bfq_queue may happen to be prematurely freed while still in
service (because there may remain no reference to it any longer).
This commit solves this problem by preventing I/O dispatch from being
plugged for the in-service bfq_queue, if the latter has no process
reference (the bfq_queue is then prevented from remaining in service).
Fixes: 3726112ec731 ("block, bfq: re-schedule empty queues if they deserve I/O plugging")
Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Reported-by: Patrick Dung <patdung100@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Patrick Dung <patdung100@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Diffstat (limited to 'block')
-rw-r--r-- | block/bfq-iosched.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 4686b68b48b4..55d4328e7c12 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -3443,6 +3443,10 @@ static void bfq_dispatch_remove(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq) static bool idling_needed_for_service_guarantees(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq) { + /* No point in idling for bfqq if it won't get requests any longer */ + if (unlikely(!bfqq_process_refs(bfqq))) + return false; + return (bfqq->wr_coeff > 1 && (bfqd->wr_busy_queues < bfq_tot_busy_queues(bfqd) || @@ -4076,6 +4080,10 @@ static bool idling_boosts_thr_without_issues(struct bfq_data *bfqd, bfqq_sequential_and_IO_bound, idling_boosts_thr; + /* No point in idling for bfqq if it won't get requests any longer */ + if (unlikely(!bfqq_process_refs(bfqq))) + return false; + bfqq_sequential_and_IO_bound = !BFQQ_SEEKY(bfqq) && bfq_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq) && bfq_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq); @@ -4169,6 +4177,10 @@ static bool bfq_better_to_idle(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) struct bfq_data *bfqd = bfqq->bfqd; bool idling_boosts_thr_with_no_issue, idling_needed_for_service_guar; + /* No point in idling for bfqq if it won't get requests any longer */ + if (unlikely(!bfqq_process_refs(bfqq))) + return false; + if (unlikely(bfqd->strict_guarantees)) return true; |