aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/acpi
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLuck, Tony2009-12-28 10:39:23 -0800
committerLen Brown2010-01-16 02:00:44 -0500
commit7a0b73a49ab56fb1e836675c00d6d0d2ba39a714 (patch)
treefb859324979b062596a0d747e8b1a4466d25912a /drivers/acpi
parent070a24f4d238612bede515023893b18f494774c4 (diff)
ACPI: Fix section mismatch error for acpi_early_processor_set_pdc()
Alex Chiang introduced acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() in commit: ACPI: processor: call _PDC early 78f1699659963fff97975df44db6d5dbe7218e55 But this results in a section mismatch: WARNING: drivers/acpi/acpi.o(.text+0xa9c1): Section mismatch in reference from the function acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() to the variable .cpuinit.data:processor_idle_dmi_table The function acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() references the variable __cpuinitdata processor_idle_dmi_table. This is often because acpi_early_processor_set_pdc lacks a __cpuinitdata annotation or the annotation of processor_idle_dmi_table is wrong. The only caller of acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() is acpi_bus_init() which is an "__init" function. So the correct fix here is to mark acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() "__init" too. Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Acked-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/acpi')
-rw-r--r--drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
index 30e4dc0cdf30..7d4ee394d0b3 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ early_init_pdc(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
return AE_OK;
}
-void acpi_early_processor_set_pdc(void)
+void __init acpi_early_processor_set_pdc(void)
{
/*
* Check whether the system is DMI table. If yes, OSPM