aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/base
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorCharles Keepax2023-06-01 11:10:36 +0100
committerMark Brown2023-06-01 12:32:53 +0100
commit99e8dd39f34333d745e6c220be5d166e85214e6c (patch)
treed42eb7bac014213e3a19312b5d1b7b715093786c /drivers/base
parent02534c8e967b51940ae7c0cd99befe216f1c2c8d (diff)
regmap: Add missing cache_only checks
The current behaviour around cache_only is slightly inconsistent, most paths will only check cache_only if cache_bypass is false, and will return -EBUSY if a read attempts to go to the hardware whilst cache_only is true. However, a couple of paths will not check cache_only at all. The most notable of these being regmap_raw_read which will check cache_only in the case it processes the transaction one register at a time, but not in the case it handles them as a block. In the typical case a device has been put into cache_only whilst powered down this can cause physical reads to happen whilst the device is unavailable. Add a check in regmap_raw_read and move the check in regmap_noinc_read, adding a check for cache_bypass, such that all paths are covered and consistent. Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601101036.1499612-2-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/base')
-rw-r--r--drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c26
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c
index db7851f0e3b8..f337c7930954 100644
--- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c
+++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c
@@ -2981,6 +2981,11 @@ int regmap_raw_read(struct regmap *map, unsigned int reg, void *val,
size_t chunk_count, chunk_bytes;
size_t chunk_regs = val_count;
+ if (!map->cache_bypass && map->cache_only) {
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
if (!map->read) {
ret = -ENOTSUPP;
goto out;
@@ -3076,18 +3081,19 @@ int regmap_noinc_read(struct regmap *map, unsigned int reg,
goto out_unlock;
}
+ /*
+ * We have not defined the FIFO semantics for cache, as the
+ * cache is just one value deep. Should we return the last
+ * written value? Just avoid this by always reading the FIFO
+ * even when using cache. Cache only will not work.
+ */
+ if (!map->cache_bypass && map->cache_only) {
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
/* Use the accelerated operation if we can */
if (map->bus->reg_noinc_read) {
- /*
- * We have not defined the FIFO semantics for cache, as the
- * cache is just one value deep. Should we return the last
- * written value? Just avoid this by always reading the FIFO
- * even when using cache. Cache only will not work.
- */
- if (map->cache_only) {
- ret = -EBUSY;
- goto out_unlock;
- }
ret = regmap_noinc_readwrite(map, reg, val, val_len, false);
goto out_unlock;
}