aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/clk/sunxi
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNathan Chancellor2019-10-22 09:50:54 -0700
committerMaxime Ripard2019-10-29 08:42:31 +0100
commitafdc74ed2d57e86c10b1d6831339770a802bab9a (patch)
tree22ac3c1d26e94bad993f41229531926f81048daf /drivers/clk/sunxi
parent54ecb8f7028c5eb3d740bb82b0f1d90f2df63c5c (diff)
clk: sunxi: Fix operator precedence in sunxi_divs_clk_setup
r375326 in Clang exposes an issue with operator precedence in sunxi_div_clk_setup: drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c:1083:30: warning: operator '?:' has lower precedence than '|'; '|' will be evaluated first [-Wbitwise-conditional-parentheses] data->div[i].critical ? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c:1083:30: note: place parentheses around the '|' expression to silence this warning data->div[i].critical ? ^ ) drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c:1083:30: note: place parentheses around the '?:' expression to evaluate it first data->div[i].critical ? ^ ( 1 warning generated. It appears that the intention was for ?: to be evaluated first so that CLK_IS_CRITICAL could be added to clkflags if the critical boolean was set; right now, | is being evaluated first. Add parentheses around the ?: block to have it be evaluated first. Fixes: 9919d44ff297 ("clk: sunxi: Use CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag for critical clks") Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/745 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/clk/sunxi')
-rw-r--r--drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
index d3a43381a792..27201fd26e44 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
@@ -1080,8 +1080,8 @@ static struct clk ** __init sunxi_divs_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
rate_hw, rate_ops,
gate_hw, &clk_gate_ops,
clkflags |
- data->div[i].critical ?
- CLK_IS_CRITICAL : 0);
+ (data->div[i].critical ?
+ CLK_IS_CRITICAL : 0));
WARN_ON(IS_ERR(clk_data->clks[i]));
}