aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/media/platform
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDan Carpenter2014-09-18 09:23:36 -0300
committerMauro Carvalho Chehab2014-09-26 06:47:43 -0300
commit5d6de11c331d61dd27cf02f54243ebd1fcfbbfb3 (patch)
treed75c3268671388c68d4ae20df6a884bc1200ac91 /drivers/media/platform
parent197a47f2d51022c613bc7bf40953a0fa3497b9c5 (diff)
[media] mx2-camera: potential negative underflow bug
My static checker complains: drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/mx2_camera.c:1070 mx2_emmaprp_resize() warn: no lower bound on 'num' The heuristic is that it's looking for values which the user can influence and we put an upper bound on them but we (perhaps accidentally) allow negative numbers. I am not very familiar with this code but I have looked at it and think there might be a bug. Making the variable unsigned seems like a safe option either way and this silences the static checker warning. The call tree is: -> subdev_do_ioctl() -> mx2_camera_set_fmt() -> mx2_emmaprp_resize() The check: if (num > RESIZE_NUM_MAX) can underflow and then we use "num" on the else path. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/media/platform')
-rw-r--r--drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/mx2_camera.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/mx2_camera.c b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/mx2_camera.c
index 2d57c1d272b8..2347612a4cc1 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/mx2_camera.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/mx2_camera.c
@@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ static int mx2_emmaprp_resize(struct mx2_camera_dev *pcdev,
struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *mf_in,
struct v4l2_pix_format *pix_out, bool apply)
{
- int num, den;
+ unsigned int num, den;
unsigned long m;
int i, dir;