diff options
author | Mauro Carvalho Chehab | 2013-11-02 06:20:16 -0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Mauro Carvalho Chehab | 2013-11-08 09:45:43 -0200 |
commit | 24e9a47e14f0a97ee97abc3dd86b2ef254448a17 (patch) | |
tree | 428764b787f1becbe4f6891226e77b6fca18b0f5 /drivers/media | |
parent | 278ba83a3a1932805be726bdd7dfb3156286d33a (diff) |
[media] v4l2-async: Don't use dynamic static allocation
Dynamic static allocation is evil, as Kernel stack is too low, and
compilation complains about it on some archs:
drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c:238:1: warning: 'v4l2_async_notifier_unregister' uses dynamic stack allocation [enabled by default]
Instead, let's enforce a limit for the buffer.
In this specific case, there's a hard limit imposed by V4L2_MAX_SUBDEVS,
with is currently 128. That means that the buffer size can be up to
128x8 = 1024 bytes (on a 64bits kernel), with is too big for stack.
Worse than that, someone could increase it and cause real troubles.
So, let's use dynamically allocated data, instead.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/media')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c | 30 |
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c index c85d69da35bd..85a6a34128a8 100644 --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c @@ -189,30 +189,53 @@ void v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier) struct v4l2_subdev *sd, *tmp; unsigned int notif_n_subdev = notifier->num_subdevs; unsigned int n_subdev = min(notif_n_subdev, V4L2_MAX_SUBDEVS); - struct device *dev[n_subdev]; + struct device **dev; int i = 0; if (!notifier->v4l2_dev) return; + dev = kmalloc(n_subdev * sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!dev) { + dev_err(notifier->v4l2_dev->dev, + "Failed to allocate device cache!\n"); + } + mutex_lock(&list_lock); list_del(¬ifier->list); list_for_each_entry_safe(sd, tmp, ¬ifier->done, async_list) { - dev[i] = get_device(sd->dev); + struct device *d; + + d = get_device(sd->dev); v4l2_async_cleanup(sd); /* If we handled USB devices, we'd have to lock the parent too */ - device_release_driver(dev[i++]); + device_release_driver(d); if (notifier->unbind) notifier->unbind(notifier, sd, sd->asd); + + /* + * Store device at the device cache, in order to call + * put_device() on the final step + */ + if (dev) + dev[i++] = d; + else + put_device(d); } mutex_unlock(&list_lock); + /* + * Call device_attach() to reprobe devices + * + * NOTE: If dev allocation fails, i is 0, and the whole loop won't be + * executed. + */ while (i--) { struct device *d = dev[i]; @@ -228,6 +251,7 @@ void v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier) } put_device(d); } + kfree(dev); notifier->v4l2_dev = NULL; |