diff options
author | Todd Poynor | 2011-10-04 11:52:29 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Samuel Ortiz | 2011-10-24 14:09:17 +0200 |
commit | ab2b9260df67e29d5bd69d989f2f84f8c2ed4238 (patch) | |
tree | 23ae7c73b270d41656673c6beed9c2dd5344b1d1 /drivers/mfd | |
parent | d3efa4edd5a3b90aff813524aeece01d73d2279b (diff) |
mfd: Fix twl6030 lockdep recursion warning on setting wake IRQs
LOCKDEP explicitly sets all irq_desc locks as a single lock-class,
causing "possible recursive locking detected" when the TWL RTC
driver calls through enable_irq_wake to twl6030_irq_set_wake,
which recursively calls irq_set_irq_wake. Although the
irq_desc and lock are different, LOCKDEP treats these as
equivalent, presumably due to problems that can be incurred
when locking more than one irq_desc, so best to avoid this.
Suspend/resume actions implemented as PM notifiers to avoid
touch the TWL core for this.
Signed-off-by: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/mfd')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c | 46 |
1 files changed, 44 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c index a17b42360e52..a014ec489e68 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ #include <linux/kthread.h> #include <linux/i2c/twl.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/suspend.h> #include "twl-core.h" @@ -83,8 +84,42 @@ static int twl6030_interrupt_mapping[24] = { /*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/ static unsigned twl6030_irq_base; +static int twl_irq; +static bool twl_irq_wake_enabled; static struct completion irq_event; +static atomic_t twl6030_wakeirqs = ATOMIC_INIT(0); + +static int twl6030_irq_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *notifier, + unsigned long pm_event, void *unused) +{ + int chained_wakeups; + + switch (pm_event) { + case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE: + chained_wakeups = atomic_read(&twl6030_wakeirqs); + + if (chained_wakeups && !twl_irq_wake_enabled) { + if (enable_irq_wake(twl_irq)) + pr_err("twl6030 IRQ wake enable failed\n"); + else + twl_irq_wake_enabled = true; + } else if (!chained_wakeups && twl_irq_wake_enabled) { + disable_irq_wake(twl_irq); + twl_irq_wake_enabled = false; + } + + break; + default: + break; + } + + return NOTIFY_DONE; +} + +static struct notifier_block twl6030_irq_pm_notifier_block = { + .notifier_call = twl6030_irq_pm_notifier, +}; /* * This thread processes interrupts reported by the Primary Interrupt Handler. @@ -189,9 +224,12 @@ static inline void activate_irq(int irq) int twl6030_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on) { - int twl_irq = (int)irq_get_chip_data(d->irq); + if (on) + atomic_inc(&twl6030_wakeirqs); + else + atomic_dec(&twl6030_wakeirqs); - return irq_set_irq_wake(twl_irq, on); + return 0; } /*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/ @@ -354,6 +392,9 @@ int twl6030_init_irq(int irq_num, unsigned irq_base, unsigned irq_end) status = PTR_ERR(task); goto fail_kthread; } + + twl_irq = irq_num; + register_pm_notifier(&twl6030_irq_pm_notifier_block); return status; fail_kthread: @@ -367,6 +408,7 @@ fail_irq: int twl6030_exit_irq(void) { + unregister_pm_notifier(&twl6030_irq_pm_notifier_block); if (twl6030_irq_base) { pr_err("twl6030: can't yet clean up IRQs?\n"); |