diff options
author | David Daney | 2012-08-22 12:03:57 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman | 2012-09-05 14:10:29 -0700 |
commit | d6ae0d578d24303941c1424b049d2cae28277666 (patch) | |
tree | 408e4d6d19acc44353761517731c5ce486e4882e /drivers/misc/eeprom | |
parent | 9af514232e9e74cbcd24700fc321b7c71a536568 (diff) |
misc/at25, dt: Improve at25 SPI eeprom device tree bindings.
Commit 002176db (misc: at25: Parse dt settings) added device tree
bindings the differ significantly in style from the I2C EEPROM
bindings and don't seem well vetted. Here I deprecate (but still
support) the "at25,*" properties, and add what I hope is a better
alternative. These new bindings also happen to be deployed in the
field and were previously submitted for consideration here:
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2012-May/015556.html
The advantages of the new bindings are that they are similar to the
I2C EEPROMs and they don't conflate read-only and the address width
modes in a binary encoded blob.
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Cc: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
Cc: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/misc/eeprom')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c | 83 |
1 files changed, 58 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c index 25003d6ceb56..4ed93dd54116 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c @@ -302,6 +302,61 @@ static ssize_t at25_mem_write(struct memory_accessor *mem, const char *buf, /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ +static int at25_np_to_chip(struct device *dev, + struct device_node *np, + struct spi_eeprom *chip) +{ + u32 val; + + memset(chip, 0, sizeof(*chip)); + strncpy(chip->name, np->name, sizeof(chip->name)); + + if (of_property_read_u32(np, "size", &val) == 0 || + of_property_read_u32(np, "at25,byte-len", &val) == 0) { + chip->byte_len = val; + } else { + dev_err(dev, "Error: missing \"size\" property\n"); + return -ENODEV; + } + + if (of_property_read_u32(np, "pagesize", &val) == 0 || + of_property_read_u32(np, "at25,page-size", &val) == 0) { + chip->page_size = (u16)val; + } else { + dev_err(dev, "Error: missing \"pagesize\" property\n"); + return -ENODEV; + } + + if (of_property_read_u32(np, "at25,addr-mode", &val) == 0) { + chip->flags = (u16)val; + } else { + if (of_property_read_u32(np, "address-width", &val)) { + dev_err(dev, + "Error: missing \"address-width\" property\n"); + return -ENODEV; + } + switch (val) { + case 8: + chip->flags |= EE_ADDR1; + break; + case 16: + chip->flags |= EE_ADDR2; + break; + case 24: + chip->flags |= EE_ADDR3; + break; + default: + dev_err(dev, + "Error: bad \"address-width\" property: %u\n", + val); + return -ENODEV; + } + if (of_find_property(np, "read-only", NULL)) + chip->flags |= EE_READONLY; + } + return 0; +} + static int at25_probe(struct spi_device *spi) { struct at25_data *at25 = NULL; @@ -314,33 +369,11 @@ static int at25_probe(struct spi_device *spi) /* Chip description */ if (!spi->dev.platform_data) { if (np) { - u32 val; - - memset(&chip, 0, sizeof(chip)); - strncpy(chip.name, np->name, 10); - - err = of_property_read_u32(np, "at25,byte-len", &val); - if (err) { - dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "invalid chip dt description\n"); - goto fail; - } - chip.byte_len = val; - - err = of_property_read_u32(np, "at25,addr-mode", &val); - if (err) { - dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "invalid chip dt description\n"); - goto fail; - } - chip.flags = (u16)val; - - err = of_property_read_u32(np, "at25,page-size", &val); - if (err) { - dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "invalid chip dt description\n"); + err = at25_np_to_chip(&spi->dev, np, &chip); + if (err) goto fail; - } - chip.page_size = (u16)val; } else { - dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "no chip description\n"); + dev_err(&spi->dev, "Error: no chip description\n"); err = -ENODEV; goto fail; } |