diff options
author | Toke Høiland-Jørgensen | 2021-06-24 18:06:01 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Borkmann | 2021-06-24 19:44:34 +0200 |
commit | 49589b23d5a92dff4a7cb705608dff7dd13ef709 (patch) | |
tree | 83b9f210e32623ee94a0aeff93fa8708d485df59 /drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb | |
parent | 547aabcac3251c40e4cd09d79dba70f7eab8cca2 (diff) |
intel: Remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP program invocation
The Intel drivers all have rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pairs around
XDP program invocations. However, the actual lifetime of the objects
referred by the XDP program invocation is longer, all the way through to
the call to xdp_do_flush(), making the scope of the rcu_read_lock() too
small. This turns out to be harmless because it all happens in a single
NAPI poll cycle (and thus under local_bh_disable()), but it makes the
rcu_read_lock() misleading.
Rather than extend the scope of the rcu_read_lock(), just get rid of it
entirely. With the addition of RCU annotations to the XDP_REDIRECT map
types that take bh execution into account, lockdep even understands this to
be safe, so there's really no reason to keep it around.
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> # i40e
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210624160609.292325-12-toke@redhat.com
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c index 5db303d64d14..7e6435dc7e80 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c @@ -8381,7 +8381,6 @@ static struct sk_buff *igb_run_xdp(struct igb_adapter *adapter, struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog; u32 act; - rcu_read_lock(); xdp_prog = READ_ONCE(rx_ring->xdp_prog); if (!xdp_prog) @@ -8416,7 +8415,6 @@ out_failure: break; } xdp_out: - rcu_read_unlock(); return ERR_PTR(-result); } |