diff options
author | Rafael J. Wysocki | 2015-04-24 02:18:01 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rafael J. Wysocki | 2015-04-24 02:18:01 +0200 |
commit | 7d284352f9cbc032f2294024b1a6b5c06765c246 (patch) | |
tree | e972852cb7a632f230e05bba3eb1eabfa399c431 /drivers | |
parent | 4c533c801d1c9b5c38458a0e7516e0cf50643782 (diff) |
ACPI / scan: Add a scan handler for PRP0001
If the special PRP0001 device ID is present in the given device's list
of ACPI/PNP IDs and the device has a valid "compatible" property in
the _DSD, it should be enumerated using the default mechanism,
unless some scan handlers match the IDs preceding PRP0001 in the
device's list of ACPI/PNP IDs. In addition to that, no scan handlers
matching the IDs following PRP0001 in that list should be attached
to the device.
To make that happen, define a scan handler that will match PRP0001
and trigger the default enumeration for the matching devices if the
"compatible" property is present for them.
Since that requires the check for platform_id and device->handler
to be removed from acpi_default_enumeration(), move the fallback
invocation of acpi_default_enumeration() to acpi_bus_attach()
(after it's checked if there's a matching ACPI driver for the
device), which is a better place to call it, and do the platform_id
check in there too (device->handler is guaranteed to be unset at
the point where the function is looking for a matching ACPI driver).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/acpi/scan.c | 33 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c index 8d40467d37f9..03141aa4ea95 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c @@ -2392,9 +2392,6 @@ static void acpi_default_enumeration(struct acpi_device *device) struct list_head resource_list; bool is_spi_i2c_slave = false; - if (!device->pnp.type.platform_id || device->handler) - return; - /* * Do not enemerate SPI/I2C slaves as they will be enuerated by their * respective parents. @@ -2407,6 +2404,29 @@ static void acpi_default_enumeration(struct acpi_device *device) acpi_create_platform_device(device); } +static const struct acpi_device_id generic_device_ids[] = { + {"PRP0001", }, + {"", }, +}; + +static int acpi_generic_device_attach(struct acpi_device *adev, + const struct acpi_device_id *not_used) +{ + /* + * Since PRP0001 is the only ID handled here, the test below can be + * unconditional. + */ + if (adev->data.of_compatible) + acpi_default_enumeration(adev); + + return 1; +} + +static struct acpi_scan_handler generic_device_handler = { + .ids = generic_device_ids, + .attach = acpi_generic_device_attach, +}; + static int acpi_scan_attach_handler(struct acpi_device *device) { struct acpi_hardware_id *hwid; @@ -2432,8 +2452,6 @@ static int acpi_scan_attach_handler(struct acpi_device *device) break; } } - if (!ret) - acpi_default_enumeration(device); return ret; } @@ -2475,6 +2493,9 @@ static void acpi_bus_attach(struct acpi_device *device) ret = device_attach(&device->dev); if (ret < 0) return; + + if (!ret && device->pnp.type.platform_id) + acpi_default_enumeration(device); } device->flags.visited = true; @@ -2633,6 +2654,8 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void) acpi_pnp_init(); acpi_int340x_thermal_init(); + acpi_scan_add_handler(&generic_device_handler); + mutex_lock(&acpi_scan_lock); /* * Enumerate devices in the ACPI namespace. |