diff options
author | Eric Paris | 2009-07-15 15:49:52 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Eric Paris | 2009-07-21 15:26:27 -0400 |
commit | f44aebcc566d1d6275f7191867b9633dc11de2ee (patch) | |
tree | a5faaf5ca8e1360f359ee22ad29582992596c3e6 /fs/notify/inotify | |
parent | c05594b62125c528d93af3a78229793aae36df7f (diff) |
inotify: use GFP_NOFS under potential memory pressure
inotify can have a watchs removed under filesystem reclaim.
=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
2.6.31-rc2 #16
---------------------------------
inconsistent {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} -> {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} usage.
khubd/217 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
(iprune_mutex){+.+.?.}, at: [<c10ba899>] invalidate_inodes+0x20/0xe3
{IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} state was registered at:
[<c10536ab>] __lock_acquire+0x2c9/0xac4
[<c1053f45>] lock_acquire+0x9f/0xc2
[<c1308872>] __mutex_lock_common+0x2d/0x323
[<c1308c00>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2e/0x36
[<c10ba6ff>] shrink_icache_memory+0x38/0x1b2
[<c108bfb6>] shrink_slab+0xe2/0x13c
[<c108c3e1>] kswapd+0x3d1/0x55d
[<c10449b5>] kthread+0x66/0x6b
[<c1003fdf>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
Two things are needed to fix this. First we need a method to tell
fsnotify_create_event() to use GFP_NOFS and second we need to stop using
one global IN_IGNORED event and allocate them one at a time. This solves
current issues with multiple IN_IGNORED on a queue having tail drop
problems and simplifies the allocations since we don't have to worry about
two tasks opperating on the IGNORED event concurrently.
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/notify/inotify')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c | 18 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c index 726118a5845b..f30d9bbc2e1b 100644 --- a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c +++ b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c @@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ int inotify_max_user_watches __read_mostly; static struct kmem_cache *inotify_inode_mark_cachep __read_mostly; struct kmem_cache *event_priv_cachep __read_mostly; -static struct fsnotify_event *inotify_ignored_event; /* * When inotify registers a new group it increments this and uses that @@ -384,12 +383,19 @@ void inotify_ignored_and_remove_idr(struct fsnotify_mark_entry *entry, struct fsnotify_group *group) { struct inotify_inode_mark_entry *ientry; + struct fsnotify_event *ignored_event; struct inotify_event_private_data *event_priv; struct fsnotify_event_private_data *fsn_event_priv; + ignored_event = fsnotify_create_event(NULL, FS_IN_IGNORED, NULL, + FSNOTIFY_EVENT_NONE, NULL, 0, + GFP_NOFS); + if (!ignored_event) + return; + ientry = container_of(entry, struct inotify_inode_mark_entry, fsn_entry); - event_priv = kmem_cache_alloc(event_priv_cachep, GFP_KERNEL); + event_priv = kmem_cache_alloc(event_priv_cachep, GFP_NOFS); if (unlikely(!event_priv)) goto skip_send_ignore; @@ -398,7 +404,7 @@ void inotify_ignored_and_remove_idr(struct fsnotify_mark_entry *entry, fsn_event_priv->group = group; event_priv->wd = ientry->wd; - fsnotify_add_notify_event(group, inotify_ignored_event, fsn_event_priv); + fsnotify_add_notify_event(group, ignored_event, fsn_event_priv); /* did the private data get added? */ if (list_empty(&fsn_event_priv->event_list)) @@ -406,6 +412,9 @@ void inotify_ignored_and_remove_idr(struct fsnotify_mark_entry *entry, skip_send_ignore: + /* matches the reference taken when the event was created */ + fsnotify_put_event(ignored_event); + /* remove this entry from the idr */ inotify_remove_from_idr(group, ientry); @@ -748,9 +757,6 @@ static int __init inotify_user_setup(void) inotify_inode_mark_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(inotify_inode_mark_entry, SLAB_PANIC); event_priv_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(inotify_event_private_data, SLAB_PANIC); - inotify_ignored_event = fsnotify_create_event(NULL, FS_IN_IGNORED, NULL, FSNOTIFY_EVENT_NONE, NULL, 0); - if (!inotify_ignored_event) - panic("unable to allocate the inotify ignored event\n"); inotify_max_queued_events = 16384; inotify_max_user_instances = 128; |