aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFilipe David Borba Manana2013-11-25 03:20:46 +0000
committerChris Mason2014-01-28 13:19:46 -0800
commit5a4267ca20d4c452a97dace4612f1dfc04147fbd (patch)
treef3dbf5aaf55c935410943ed6af031641e892b5c1 /fs
parent1b8e7e45e57cc98bf6c8ab9b3087d634636ba2e6 (diff)
Btrfs: try harder to avoid btree node splits
When attempting to move items from our target leaf to its neighbor leaves (right and left), we only need to free data_size - free_space bytes from our leaf in order to add the new item (which has size of data_size bytes). Therefore attempt to move items to the right and left leaves if they have at least data_size - free_space bytes free, instead of data_size bytes free. After 5 runs of the following test, I got a smaller number of btree node splits overall: sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=512 --file-total-size=5G \ --file-test-mode=seqwr --num-threads=512 \ --file-block-size=8192 --max-requests=100000 --file-io-mode=sync Before this change: * 6171 splits (average of 5 test runs) * 61.508Mb/sec of throughput (average of 5 test runs) After this change: * 6036 splits (average of 5 test runs) * 63.533Mb/sec of throughput (average of 5 test runs) An ideal test would not just have multiple threads/processes writing to a file (insertion of file extent items) but also do other operations that result in insertion of items with varied sizes, like file/directory creations, creation of links, symlinks, xattrs, etc. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
-rw-r--r--fs/btrfs/ctree.c20
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index 22629809c9c4..11f9a1848c7b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
@@ -3929,14 +3929,17 @@ static noinline int push_for_double_split(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
int progress = 0;
int slot;
u32 nritems;
+ int space_needed = data_size;
slot = path->slots[0];
+ if (slot < btrfs_header_nritems(path->nodes[0]))
+ space_needed -= btrfs_leaf_free_space(root, path->nodes[0]);
/*
* try to push all the items after our slot into the
* right leaf
*/
- ret = push_leaf_right(trans, root, path, 1, data_size, 0, slot);
+ ret = push_leaf_right(trans, root, path, 1, space_needed, 0, slot);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
@@ -3956,7 +3959,7 @@ static noinline int push_for_double_split(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
/* try to push all the items before our slot into the next leaf */
slot = path->slots[0];
- ret = push_leaf_left(trans, root, path, 1, data_size, 0, slot);
+ ret = push_leaf_left(trans, root, path, 1, space_needed, 0, slot);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
@@ -4000,13 +4003,18 @@ static noinline int split_leaf(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
/* first try to make some room by pushing left and right */
if (data_size && path->nodes[1]) {
- wret = push_leaf_right(trans, root, path, data_size,
- data_size, 0, 0);
+ int space_needed = data_size;
+
+ if (slot < btrfs_header_nritems(l))
+ space_needed -= btrfs_leaf_free_space(root, l);
+
+ wret = push_leaf_right(trans, root, path, space_needed,
+ space_needed, 0, 0);
if (wret < 0)
return wret;
if (wret) {
- wret = push_leaf_left(trans, root, path, data_size,
- data_size, 0, (u32)-1);
+ wret = push_leaf_left(trans, root, path, space_needed,
+ space_needed, 0, (u32)-1);
if (wret < 0)
return wret;
}