jbd2: fix checkpoint cleanup performance regression

commit 373ac521799d9e97061515aca6ec6621789036bb upstream.

journal_clean_one_cp_list() has been merged into
journal_shrink_one_cp_list(), but do chekpoint buffer cleanup from the
committing process is just a best effort, it should stop scan once it
meet a busy buffer, or else it will cause a lot of invalid buffer scan
and checks. We catch a performance regression when doing fs_mark tests
below.

Test cmd:
 ./fs_mark  -d  scratch  -s  1024  -n  10000  -t  1  -D  100  -N  100

Before merging checkpoint buffer cleanup:
 FSUse%        Count         Size    Files/sec     App Overhead
     95        10000         1024       8304.9            49033

After merging checkpoint buffer cleanup:
 FSUse%        Count         Size    Files/sec     App Overhead
     95        10000         1024       7649.0            50012
 FSUse%        Count         Size    Files/sec     App Overhead
     95        10000         1024       2107.1            50871

After merging checkpoint buffer cleanup, the total loop count in
journal_shrink_one_cp_list() could be up to 6,261,600+ (50,000+ ~
100,000+ in general), most of them are invalid. This patch fix it
through passing 'shrink_type' into journal_shrink_one_cp_list() and add
a new 'SHRINK_BUSY_STOP' to indicate it should stop once meet a busy
buffer. After fix, the loop count descending back to 10,000+.

After this fix:
 FSUse%        Count         Size    Files/sec     App Overhead
     95        10000         1024       8558.4            49109

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Fixes: b98dba273a0e ("jbd2: remove journal_clean_one_cp_list()")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230714025528.564988-2-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 14 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
index 9ec91017a7f3..936c6d758a65 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
@@ -349,6 +349,8 @@ int jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail(journal_t *journal)
 
 /* Checkpoint list management */
 
+enum shrink_type {SHRINK_DESTROY, SHRINK_BUSY_STOP, SHRINK_BUSY_SKIP};
+
 /*
  * journal_shrink_one_cp_list
  *
@@ -360,7 +362,8 @@ int jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail(journal_t *journal)
  * Called with j_list_lock held.
  */
 static unsigned long journal_shrink_one_cp_list(struct journal_head *jh,
-						bool destroy, bool *released)
+						enum shrink_type type,
+						bool *released)
 {
 	struct journal_head *last_jh;
 	struct journal_head *next_jh = jh;
@@ -376,12 +379,15 @@ static unsigned long journal_shrink_one_cp_list(struct journal_head *jh,
 		jh = next_jh;
 		next_jh = jh->b_cpnext;
 
-		if (destroy) {
+		if (type == SHRINK_DESTROY) {
 			ret = __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh);
 		} else {
 			ret = jbd2_journal_try_remove_checkpoint(jh);
-			if (ret < 0)
-				continue;
+			if (ret < 0) {
+				if (type == SHRINK_BUSY_SKIP)
+					continue;
+				break;
+			}
 		}
 
 		nr_freed++;
@@ -445,7 +451,7 @@ again:
 		tid = transaction->t_tid;
 
 		freed = journal_shrink_one_cp_list(transaction->t_checkpoint_list,
-						   false, &released);
+						   SHRINK_BUSY_SKIP, &released);
 		nr_freed += freed;
 		(*nr_to_scan) -= min(*nr_to_scan, freed);
 		if (*nr_to_scan == 0)
@@ -485,19 +491,21 @@ out:
 void __jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list(journal_t *journal, bool destroy)
 {
 	transaction_t *transaction, *last_transaction, *next_transaction;
+	enum shrink_type type;
 	bool released;
 
 	transaction = journal->j_checkpoint_transactions;
 	if (!transaction)
 		return;
 
+	type = destroy ? SHRINK_DESTROY : SHRINK_BUSY_STOP;
 	last_transaction = transaction->t_cpprev;
 	next_transaction = transaction;
 	do {
 		transaction = next_transaction;
 		next_transaction = transaction->t_cpnext;
 		journal_shrink_one_cp_list(transaction->t_checkpoint_list,
-					   destroy, &released);
+					   type, &released);
 		/*
 		 * This function only frees up some memory if possible so we
 		 * dont have an obligation to finish processing. Bail out if