diff options
author | Björn Töpel | 2020-11-30 19:51:56 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Borkmann | 2020-12-01 00:09:25 +0100 |
commit | 7fd3253a7de6a317a0683f83739479fb880bffc8 (patch) | |
tree | 8490a9756c6a4a7f5078fd856f23b568703e3680 /include/net/busy_poll.h | |
parent | 854055c0cf30d732b3514ce7956976f60496b1a1 (diff) |
net: Introduce preferred busy-polling
The existing busy-polling mode, enabled by the SO_BUSY_POLL socket
option or system-wide using the /proc/sys/net/core/busy_read knob, is
an opportunistic. That means that if the NAPI context is not
scheduled, it will poll it. If, after busy-polling, the budget is
exceeded the busy-polling logic will schedule the NAPI onto the
regular softirq handling.
One implication of the behavior above is that a busy/heavy loaded NAPI
context will never enter/allow for busy-polling. Some applications
prefer that most NAPI processing would be done by busy-polling.
This series adds a new socket option, SO_PREFER_BUSY_POLL, that works
in concert with the napi_defer_hard_irqs and gro_flush_timeout
knobs. The napi_defer_hard_irqs and gro_flush_timeout knobs were
introduced in commit 6f8b12d661d0 ("net: napi: add hard irqs deferral
feature"), and allows for a user to defer interrupts to be enabled and
instead schedule the NAPI context from a watchdog timer. When a user
enables the SO_PREFER_BUSY_POLL, again with the other knobs enabled,
and the NAPI context is being processed by a softirq, the softirq NAPI
processing will exit early to allow the busy-polling to be performed.
If the application stops performing busy-polling via a system call,
the watchdog timer defined by gro_flush_timeout will timeout, and
regular softirq handling will resume.
In summary; Heavy traffic applications that prefer busy-polling over
softirq processing should use this option.
Example usage:
$ echo 2 | sudo tee /sys/class/net/ens785f1/napi_defer_hard_irqs
$ echo 200000 | sudo tee /sys/class/net/ens785f1/gro_flush_timeout
Note that the timeout should be larger than the userspace processing
window, otherwise the watchdog will timeout and fall back to regular
softirq processing.
Enable the SO_BUSY_POLL/SO_PREFER_BUSY_POLL options on your socket.
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201130185205.196029-2-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
Diffstat (limited to 'include/net/busy_poll.h')
-rw-r--r-- | include/net/busy_poll.h | 5 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/include/net/busy_poll.h b/include/net/busy_poll.h index b001fa91c14e..0292b8353d7e 100644 --- a/include/net/busy_poll.h +++ b/include/net/busy_poll.h @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ bool sk_busy_loop_end(void *p, unsigned long start_time); void napi_busy_loop(unsigned int napi_id, bool (*loop_end)(void *, unsigned long), - void *loop_end_arg); + void *loop_end_arg, bool prefer_busy_poll); #else /* CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL */ static inline unsigned long net_busy_loop_on(void) @@ -105,7 +105,8 @@ static inline void sk_busy_loop(struct sock *sk, int nonblock) unsigned int napi_id = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_napi_id); if (napi_id >= MIN_NAPI_ID) - napi_busy_loop(napi_id, nonblock ? NULL : sk_busy_loop_end, sk); + napi_busy_loop(napi_id, nonblock ? NULL : sk_busy_loop_end, sk, + READ_ONCE(sk->sk_prefer_busy_poll)); #endif } |