ftrace: Implement fs notification for tracing_max_latency

This patch implements the feature that the tracing_max_latency file,
e.g. /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/tracing_max_latency will receive
notifications through the fsnotify framework when a new latency is
available.

One particularly interesting use of this facility is when enabling
threshold tracing, through /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/tracing_thresh,
together with the preempt/irqsoff tracers. This makes it possible to
implement a user space program that can, with equal probability,
obtain traces of latencies that occur immediately after each other in
spite of the fact that the preempt/irqsoff tracers operate in overwrite
mode.

This facility works with the hwlat, preempt/irqsoff, and wakeup
tracers.

The tracers may call the latency_fsnotify() from places such as
__schedule() or do_idle(); this makes it impossible to call
queue_work() directly without risking a deadlock. The same would
happen with a softirq,  kernel thread or tasklet. For this reason we
use the irq_work mechanism to call queue_work().

This patch creates a new workqueue. The reason for doing this is that
I wanted to use the WQ_UNBOUND and WQ_HIGHPRI flags.  My thinking was
that WQ_UNBOUND might help with the latency in some important cases.

If we use:

queue_work(system_highpri_wq, &tr->fsnotify_work);

then the work will (almost) always execute on the same CPU but if we are
unlucky that CPU could be too busy while there could be another CPU in
the system that would be able to process the work soon enough.

queue_work_on() could be used to queue the work on another CPU but it
seems difficult to select the right CPU.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191008220824.7911-2-viktor.rosendahl@gmail.com

Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Viktor Rosendahl (BMW) <viktor.rosendahl@gmail.com>
[ Added max() to have one compare for max latency ]
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions