aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBumyong Lee2021-05-10 18:10:04 +0900
committerKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk2021-06-21 08:59:02 -0400
commit5f89468e2f060031cd89fd4287298e0eaf246bf6 (patch)
tree1be0fd73073ad09ce92ec7ce1f3c6328679551eb /kernel
parentdfc06b389a4f54e78c03abecd5b42ab6ea8d492a (diff)
swiotlb: manipulate orig_addr when tlb_addr has offset
in case of driver wants to sync part of ranges with offset, swiotlb_tbl_sync_single() copies from orig_addr base to tlb_addr with offset and ends up with data mismatch. It was removed from "swiotlb: don't modify orig_addr in swiotlb_tbl_sync_single", but said logic has to be added back in. From Linus's email: "That commit which the removed the offset calculation entirely, because the old (unsigned long)tlb_addr & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1) was wrong, but instead of removing it, I think it should have just fixed it to be (tlb_addr - mem->start) & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1); instead. That way the slot offset always matches the slot index calculation." (Unfortunatly that broke NVMe). The use-case that drivers are hitting is as follow: 1. Get dma_addr_t from dma_map_single() dma_addr_t tlb_addr = dma_map_single(dev, vaddr, vsize, DMA_TO_DEVICE); |<---------------vsize------------->| +-----------------------------------+ | | original buffer +-----------------------------------+ vaddr swiotlb_align_offset |<----->|<---------------vsize------------->| +-------+-----------------------------------+ | | | swiotlb buffer +-------+-----------------------------------+ tlb_addr 2. Do something 3. Sync dma_addr_t through dma_sync_single_for_device(..) dma_sync_single_for_device(dev, tlb_addr + offset, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); Error case. Copy data to original buffer but it is from base addr (instead of base addr + offset) in original buffer: swiotlb_align_offset |<----->|<- offset ->|<- size ->| +-------+-----------------------------------+ | | |##########| | swiotlb buffer +-------+-----------------------------------+ tlb_addr |<- size ->| +-----------------------------------+ |##########| | original buffer +-----------------------------------+ vaddr The fix is to copy the data to the original buffer and take into account the offset, like so: swiotlb_align_offset |<----->|<- offset ->|<- size ->| +-------+-----------------------------------+ | | |##########| | swiotlb buffer +-------+-----------------------------------+ tlb_addr |<- offset ->|<- size ->| +-----------------------------------+ | |##########| | original buffer +-----------------------------------+ vaddr [One fix which was Linus's that made more sense to as it created a symmetry would break NVMe. The reason for that is the: unsigned int offset = (tlb_addr - mem->start) & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1); would come up with the proper offset, but it would lose the alignment (which this patch contains).] Fixes: 16fc3cef33a0 ("swiotlb: don't modify orig_addr in swiotlb_tbl_sync_single") Signed-off-by: Bumyong Lee <bumyong.lee@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reported-by: Dominique MARTINET <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com> Reported-by: Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@nxp.com> Tested-by: Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@nxp.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r--kernel/dma/swiotlb.c23
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index 8ca7d505d61c..e50df8d8f87e 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -335,6 +335,14 @@ void __init swiotlb_exit(void)
}
/*
+ * Return the offset into a iotlb slot required to keep the device happy.
+ */
+static unsigned int swiotlb_align_offset(struct device *dev, u64 addr)
+{
+ return addr & dma_get_min_align_mask(dev) & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);
+}
+
+/*
* Bounce: copy the swiotlb buffer from or back to the original dma location
*/
static void swiotlb_bounce(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr, size_t size,
@@ -346,10 +354,17 @@ static void swiotlb_bounce(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr, size_t size
size_t alloc_size = mem->slots[index].alloc_size;
unsigned long pfn = PFN_DOWN(orig_addr);
unsigned char *vaddr = phys_to_virt(tlb_addr);
+ unsigned int tlb_offset;
if (orig_addr == INVALID_PHYS_ADDR)
return;
+ tlb_offset = (tlb_addr & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1)) -
+ swiotlb_align_offset(dev, orig_addr);
+
+ orig_addr += tlb_offset;
+ alloc_size -= tlb_offset;
+
if (size > alloc_size) {
dev_WARN_ONCE(dev, 1,
"Buffer overflow detected. Allocation size: %zu. Mapping size: %zu.\n",
@@ -391,14 +406,6 @@ static void swiotlb_bounce(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr, size_t size
#define slot_addr(start, idx) ((start) + ((idx) << IO_TLB_SHIFT))
/*
- * Return the offset into a iotlb slot required to keep the device happy.
- */
-static unsigned int swiotlb_align_offset(struct device *dev, u64 addr)
-{
- return addr & dma_get_min_align_mask(dev) & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);
-}
-
-/*
* Carefully handle integer overflow which can occur when boundary_mask == ~0UL.
*/
static inline unsigned long get_max_slots(unsigned long boundary_mask)