aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTheodore Ts'o2017-04-28 09:51:54 -0400
committerTheodore Ts'o2017-04-28 09:51:54 -0400
commit80a2ea9f85850f1cdae814be03b4a16c3d3abc00 (patch)
tree82d954dc3c6f2f883b7c37a80386804edbfb913d /kernel
parent39da7c509acff13fc8cb12ec1bb20337c988ed36 (diff)
mm: retry writepages() on ENOMEM when doing an data integrity writeback
Currently, file system's writepages() function must not fail with an ENOMEM, since if they do, it's possible for buffered data to be lost. This is because on a data integrity writeback writepages() gets called but once, and if it returns ENOMEM, if you're lucky the error will get reflected back to the userspace process calling fsync(). If you aren't lucky, the user is unmounting the file system, and the dirty pages will simply be lost. For this reason, file system code generally will use GFP_NOFS, and in some cases, will retry the allocation in a loop, on the theory that "kernel livelocks are temporary; data loss is forever". Unfortunately, this can indeed cause livelocks, since inside the writepages() call, the file system is holding various mutexes, and these mutexes may prevent the OOM killer from killing its targetted victim if it is also holding on to those mutexes. A better solution would be to allow writepages() to call the memory allocator with flags that give greater latitude to the allocator to fail, and then release its locks and return ENOMEM, and in the case of background writeback, the writes can be retried at a later time. In the case of data-integrity writeback retry after waiting a brief amount of time. Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions