diff options
author | Masami Hiramatsu | 2021-06-02 17:19:07 +0900 |
---|---|---|
committer | Steven Rostedt (VMware) | 2021-06-10 13:41:26 -0400 |
commit | e5efaeb8a8f527d6e91289ff1f67fbcae452b2ca (patch) | |
tree | b2a1a004dc24a7e03f2fb819689e5c35cce00d12 /lib/bootconfig.c | |
parent | ca24306d83a125df187ad53eddb038fe0cffb8ca (diff) |
bootconfig: Support mixing a value and subkeys under a key
Support mixing a value and subkeys under a key. Since kernel cmdline
options will support "aaa.bbb=value1 aaa.bbb.ccc=value2", it is
better that the bootconfig supports such configuration too.
Note that this does not change syntax itself but just accepts
mixed value and subkeys e.g.
key = value1
key.subkey = value2
But this is not accepted;
key {
value1
subkey = value2
}
That will make value1 as a subkey.
Also, the order of the value node under a key is fixed. If there
are a value and subkeys, the value is always the first child node
of the key. Thus if user specifies subkeys first, e.g.
key.subkey = value1
key = value2
In the program (and /proc/bootconfig), it will be shown as below
key = value2
key.subkey = value1
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/162262194685.264090.7738574774030567419.stgit@devnote2
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/bootconfig.c')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/bootconfig.c | 65 |
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/lib/bootconfig.c b/lib/bootconfig.c index 44dcdcbd746a..927017431fb6 100644 --- a/lib/bootconfig.c +++ b/lib/bootconfig.c @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ xbc_node_find_child(struct xbc_node *parent, const char *key) struct xbc_node *node; if (parent) - node = xbc_node_get_child(parent); + node = xbc_node_get_subkey(parent); else node = xbc_root_node(); @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ xbc_node_find_child(struct xbc_node *parent, const char *key) if (!xbc_node_match_prefix(node, &key)) node = xbc_node_get_next(node); else if (*key != '\0') - node = xbc_node_get_child(node); + node = xbc_node_get_subkey(node); else break; } @@ -274,6 +274,8 @@ int __init xbc_node_compose_key_after(struct xbc_node *root, struct xbc_node * __init xbc_node_find_next_leaf(struct xbc_node *root, struct xbc_node *node) { + struct xbc_node *next; + if (unlikely(!xbc_data)) return NULL; @@ -282,6 +284,13 @@ struct xbc_node * __init xbc_node_find_next_leaf(struct xbc_node *root, if (!node) node = xbc_nodes; } else { + /* Leaf node may have a subkey */ + next = xbc_node_get_subkey(node); + if (next) { + node = next; + goto found; + } + if (node == root) /* @root was a leaf, no child node. */ return NULL; @@ -296,6 +305,7 @@ struct xbc_node * __init xbc_node_find_next_leaf(struct xbc_node *root, node = xbc_node_get_next(node); } +found: while (node && !xbc_node_is_leaf(node)) node = xbc_node_get_child(node); @@ -375,18 +385,20 @@ static inline __init struct xbc_node *xbc_last_child(struct xbc_node *node) return node; } -static struct xbc_node * __init xbc_add_sibling(char *data, u32 flag) +static struct xbc_node * __init __xbc_add_sibling(char *data, u32 flag, bool head) { struct xbc_node *sib, *node = xbc_add_node(data, flag); if (node) { if (!last_parent) { + /* Ignore @head in this case */ node->parent = XBC_NODE_MAX; sib = xbc_last_sibling(xbc_nodes); sib->next = xbc_node_index(node); } else { node->parent = xbc_node_index(last_parent); - if (!last_parent->child) { + if (!last_parent->child || head) { + node->next = last_parent->child; last_parent->child = xbc_node_index(node); } else { sib = xbc_node_get_child(last_parent); @@ -400,6 +412,16 @@ static struct xbc_node * __init xbc_add_sibling(char *data, u32 flag) return node; } +static inline struct xbc_node * __init xbc_add_sibling(char *data, u32 flag) +{ + return __xbc_add_sibling(data, flag, false); +} + +static inline struct xbc_node * __init xbc_add_head_sibling(char *data, u32 flag) +{ + return __xbc_add_sibling(data, flag, true); +} + static inline __init struct xbc_node *xbc_add_child(char *data, u32 flag) { struct xbc_node *node = xbc_add_sibling(data, flag); @@ -568,8 +590,9 @@ static int __init __xbc_add_key(char *k) node = find_match_node(xbc_nodes, k); else { child = xbc_node_get_child(last_parent); + /* Since the value node is the first child, skip it. */ if (child && xbc_node_is_value(child)) - return xbc_parse_error("Subkey is mixed with value", k); + child = xbc_node_get_next(child); node = find_match_node(child, k); } @@ -612,27 +635,29 @@ static int __init xbc_parse_kv(char **k, char *v, int op) if (ret) return ret; - child = xbc_node_get_child(last_parent); - if (child) { - if (xbc_node_is_key(child)) - return xbc_parse_error("Value is mixed with subkey", v); - else if (op == '=') - return xbc_parse_error("Value is redefined", v); - } - c = __xbc_parse_value(&v, &next); if (c < 0) return c; - if (op == ':' && child) { - xbc_init_node(child, v, XBC_VALUE); - } else { - if (op == '+' && child) - last_parent = xbc_last_child(child); - if (!xbc_add_sibling(v, XBC_VALUE)) - return -ENOMEM; + child = xbc_node_get_child(last_parent); + if (child && xbc_node_is_value(child)) { + if (op == '=') + return xbc_parse_error("Value is redefined", v); + if (op == ':') { + unsigned short nidx = child->next; + + xbc_init_node(child, v, XBC_VALUE); + child->next = nidx; /* keep subkeys */ + goto array; + } + /* op must be '+' */ + last_parent = xbc_last_child(child); } + /* The value node should always be the first child */ + if (!xbc_add_head_sibling(v, XBC_VALUE)) + return -ENOMEM; +array: if (c == ',') { /* Array */ c = xbc_parse_array(&next); if (c < 0) |