diff options
author | Dave Jones | 2012-03-14 22:17:39 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paul E. McKenney | 2012-04-24 20:54:49 -0700 |
commit | 559f9badd11ddf399f88b18b4c0f110fd511ae53 (patch) | |
tree | 443f8c575362e19c01c07173c82b0fc3763ebc50 /lib | |
parent | 66f75a5d028beaf67c931435fdc3e7823125730c (diff) |
rcu: List-debug variants of rcu list routines.
* Make __list_add_rcu check the next->prev and prev->next pointers
just like __list_add does.
* Make list_del_rcu use __list_del_entry, which does the same checking
at deletion time.
Has been running for a week here without anything being tripped up,
but it seems worth adding for completeness just in case something
ever does corrupt those lists.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/list_debug.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/list_debug.c b/lib/list_debug.c index 982b850d4e7a..3810b481f940 100644 --- a/lib/list_debug.c +++ b/lib/list_debug.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include <linux/list.h> #include <linux/bug.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/rculist.h> /* * Insert a new entry between two known consecutive entries. @@ -75,3 +76,24 @@ void list_del(struct list_head *entry) entry->prev = LIST_POISON2; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(list_del); + +/* + * RCU variants. + */ +void __list_add_rcu(struct list_head *new, + struct list_head *prev, struct list_head *next) +{ + WARN(next->prev != prev, + "list_add_rcu corruption. next->prev should be " + "prev (%p), but was %p. (next=%p).\n", + prev, next->prev, next); + WARN(prev->next != next, + "list_add_rcu corruption. prev->next should be " + "next (%p), but was %p. (prev=%p).\n", + next, prev->next, prev); + new->next = next; + new->prev = prev; + rcu_assign_pointer(list_next_rcu(prev), new); + next->prev = new; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_add_rcu); |