diff options
author | Michal Hocko | 2017-02-22 15:46:25 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds | 2017-02-22 16:41:30 -0800 |
commit | 6c18ba7a18997dadbf7ee912e15677ad2c9993e5 (patch) | |
tree | 96d56cead2db0b666c2c1398cc3468cdbdbd7f7e /mm/page_alloc.c | |
parent | 06ad276ac18742c6b281698d41b27a290cd42407 (diff) |
mm: help __GFP_NOFAIL allocations which do not trigger OOM killer
Now that __GFP_NOFAIL doesn't override decisions to skip the oom killer
we are left with requests which require to loop inside the allocator
without invoking the oom killer (e.g. GFP_NOFS|__GFP_NOFAIL used by fs
code) and so they might, in very unlikely situations, loop for ever -
e.g. other parallel request could starve them.
This patch tries to limit the likelihood of such a lockup by giving
these __GFP_NOFAIL requests a chance to move on by consuming a small
part of memory reserves. We are using ALLOC_HARDER which should be
enough to prevent from the starvation by regular allocation requests,
yet it shouldn't consume enough from the reserves to disrupt high
priority requests (ALLOC_HIGH).
While we are at it, let's introduce a helper __alloc_pages_cpuset_fallback
which enforces the cpusets but allows to fallback to ignore them if the
first attempt fails. __GFP_NOFAIL requests can be considered important
enough to allow cpuset runaway in order for the system to move on. It
is highly unlikely that any of these will be GFP_USER anyway.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161220134904.21023-4-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/page_alloc.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/page_alloc.c | 46 |
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 1e37740837ac..a179607de26f 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -3056,6 +3056,26 @@ void warn_alloc(gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *nodemask, const char *fmt, ...) } static inline struct page * +__alloc_pages_cpuset_fallback(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, + unsigned int alloc_flags, + const struct alloc_context *ac) +{ + struct page *page; + + page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask, order, + alloc_flags|ALLOC_CPUSET, ac); + /* + * fallback to ignore cpuset restriction if our nodes + * are depleted + */ + if (!page) + page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask, order, + alloc_flags, ac); + + return page; +} + +static inline struct page * __alloc_pages_may_oom(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, const struct alloc_context *ac, unsigned long *did_some_progress) { @@ -3119,17 +3139,13 @@ __alloc_pages_may_oom(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, if (out_of_memory(&oc) || WARN_ON_ONCE(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL)) { *did_some_progress = 1; - if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL) { - page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask, order, - ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS|ALLOC_CPUSET, ac); - /* - * fallback to ignore cpuset restriction if our nodes - * are depleted - */ - if (!page) - page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask, order, + /* + * Help non-failing allocations by giving them access to memory + * reserves + */ + if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL) + page = __alloc_pages_cpuset_fallback(gfp_mask, order, ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS, ac); - } } out: mutex_unlock(&oom_lock); @@ -3785,6 +3801,16 @@ nopage: */ WARN_ON_ONCE(order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER); + /* + * Help non-failing allocations by giving them access to memory + * reserves but do not use ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS because this + * could deplete whole memory reserves which would just make + * the situation worse + */ + page = __alloc_pages_cpuset_fallback(gfp_mask, order, ALLOC_HARDER, ac); + if (page) + goto got_pg; + cond_resched(); goto retry; } |