diff options
| author | Gu Zheng | 2014-06-25 09:57:18 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tejun Heo | 2014-06-25 09:42:11 -0400 |
| commit | 391acf970d21219a2a5446282d3b20eace0c0d7a (patch) | |
| tree | 06ccf8be2eeff0a3793b38a79e1833c2470258a4 /mm | |
| parent | 99bae5f94185c2cc65701e95c54e31e2f4345b88 (diff) | |
cpuset,mempolicy: fix sleeping function called from invalid context
When runing with the kernel(3.15-rc7+), the follow bug occurs:
[ 9969.258987] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:586
[ 9969.359906] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 160655, name: python
[ 9969.441175] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[ 9969.488184] CPU: 26 PID: 160655 Comm: python Tainted: G A 3.15.0-rc7+ #85
[ 9969.581032] Hardware name: FUJITSU-SV PRIMEQUEST 1800E/SB, BIOS PRIMEQUEST 1000 Series BIOS Version 1.39 11/16/2012
[ 9969.706052] ffffffff81a20e60 ffff8803e941fbd0 ffffffff8162f523 ffff8803e941fd18
[ 9969.795323] ffff8803e941fbe0 ffffffff8109995a ffff8803e941fc58 ffffffff81633e6c
[ 9969.884710] ffffffff811ba5dc ffff880405c6b480 ffff88041fdd90a0 0000000000002000
[ 9969.974071] Call Trace:
[ 9970.003403] [<ffffffff8162f523>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x66
[ 9970.065074] [<ffffffff8109995a>] __might_sleep+0xfa/0x130
[ 9970.130743] [<ffffffff81633e6c>] mutex_lock_nested+0x3c/0x4f0
[ 9970.200638] [<ffffffff811ba5dc>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x1bc/0x210
[ 9970.272610] [<ffffffff81105807>] cpuset_mems_allowed+0x27/0x140
[ 9970.344584] [<ffffffff811b1303>] ? __mpol_dup+0x63/0x150
[ 9970.409282] [<ffffffff811b1385>] __mpol_dup+0xe5/0x150
[ 9970.471897] [<ffffffff811b1303>] ? __mpol_dup+0x63/0x150
[ 9970.536585] [<ffffffff81068c86>] ? copy_process.part.23+0x606/0x1d40
[ 9970.613763] [<ffffffff810bf28d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[ 9970.683660] [<ffffffff810ddddf>] ? monotonic_to_bootbased+0x2f/0x50
[ 9970.759795] [<ffffffff81068cf0>] copy_process.part.23+0x670/0x1d40
[ 9970.834885] [<ffffffff8106a598>] do_fork+0xd8/0x380
[ 9970.894375] [<ffffffff81110e4c>] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0x9c/0xf0
[ 9970.969470] [<ffffffff8106a8c6>] SyS_clone+0x16/0x20
[ 9971.030011] [<ffffffff81642009>] stub_clone+0x69/0x90
[ 9971.091573] [<ffffffff81641c29>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
The cause is that cpuset_mems_allowed() try to take
mutex_lock(&callback_mutex) under the rcu_read_lock(which was hold in
__mpol_dup()). And in cpuset_mems_allowed(), the access to cpuset is
under rcu_read_lock, so in __mpol_dup, we can reduce the rcu_read_lock
protection region to protect the access to cpuset only in
current_cpuset_is_being_rebound(). So that we can avoid this bug.
This patch is a temporary solution that just addresses the bug
mentioned above, can not fix the long-standing issue about cpuset.mems
rebinding on fork():
"When the forker's task_struct is duplicated (which includes
->mems_allowed) and it races with an update to cpuset_being_rebound
in update_tasks_nodemask() then the task's mems_allowed doesn't get
updated. And the child task's mems_allowed can be wrong if the
cpuset's nodemask changes before the child has been added to the
cgroup's tasklist."
Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/mempolicy.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c index 284974230459..9a3783ccff67 100644 --- a/mm/mempolicy.c +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c @@ -2145,7 +2145,6 @@ struct mempolicy *__mpol_dup(struct mempolicy *old) } else *new = *old; - rcu_read_lock(); if (current_cpuset_is_being_rebound()) { nodemask_t mems = cpuset_mems_allowed(current); if (new->flags & MPOL_F_REBINDING) @@ -2153,7 +2152,6 @@ struct mempolicy *__mpol_dup(struct mempolicy *old) else mpol_rebind_policy(new, &mems, MPOL_REBIND_ONCE); } - rcu_read_unlock(); atomic_set(&new->refcnt, 1); return new; } |