diff options
author | Gustavo Padovan | 2012-06-15 02:30:20 -0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Gustavo Padovan | 2012-08-06 15:19:36 -0300 |
commit | 269c4845d5b3627b95b1934107251bacbe99bb68 (patch) | |
tree | ac0871cca71d8ee6319bbe998b4c09e1b42efa5b /net/bluetooth | |
parent | 61c964ba1748e984cb232b431582815899bf10fe (diff) |
Bluetooth: Fix possible deadlock in SCO code
sco_chan_del() only has conn != NULL when called from sco_conn_del() so
just move the code from it that deal with conn to sco_conn_del().
[ 120.765529]
[ 120.765529] ======================================================
[ 120.766529] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[ 120.766529] 3.5.0-rc1-10292-g3701f94-dirty #70 Tainted: G W
[ 120.766529] -------------------------------------------------------
[ 120.766529] kworker/u:3/1497 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 120.766529] (&(&conn->lock)->rlock#2){+.+...}, at:
[<ffffffffa00b7ecc>] sco_chan_del+0x4c/0x170 [bluetooth]
[ 120.766529]
[ 120.766529] but task is already holding lock:
[ 120.766529] (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+...}, at:
[<ffffffffa00b8401>] sco_conn_del+0x61/0xe0 [bluetooth]
[ 120.766529]
[ 120.766529] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 120.766529]
[ 120.766529]
[ 120.766529] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 120.766529]
[ 120.766529] -> #1 (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+...}:
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffff8107980e>] lock_acquire+0x8e/0xb0
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffff813c19e0>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffffa00b85e9>] sco_connect_cfm+0x79/0x300
[bluetooth]
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffffa0094b13>]
hci_sync_conn_complete_evt.isra.90+0x343/0x400 [bluetooth]
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffffa009d447>] hci_event_packet+0x317/0xfb0
[bluetooth]
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffffa008aa68>] hci_rx_work+0x2c8/0x890
[bluetooth]
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffff81047db7>] process_one_work+0x197/0x460
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffff810489d6>] worker_thread+0x126/0x2d0
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffff8104ee4d>] kthread+0x9d/0xb0
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffff813c4294>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 120.766529]
[ 120.766529] -> #0 (&(&conn->lock)->rlock#2){+.+...}:
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffff81078a8a>] __lock_acquire+0x154a/0x1d30
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffff8107980e>] lock_acquire+0x8e/0xb0
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffff813c19e0>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffffa00b7ecc>] sco_chan_del+0x4c/0x170
[bluetooth]
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffffa00b8414>] sco_conn_del+0x74/0xe0
[bluetooth]
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffffa00b88a2>] sco_disconn_cfm+0x32/0x60
[bluetooth]
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffffa0093a82>]
hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.53+0x242/0x390 [bluetooth]
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffffa009d747>] hci_event_packet+0x617/0xfb0
[bluetooth]
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffffa008aa68>] hci_rx_work+0x2c8/0x890
[bluetooth]
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffff81047db7>] process_one_work+0x197/0x460
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffff810489d6>] worker_thread+0x126/0x2d0
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffff8104ee4d>] kthread+0x9d/0xb0
[ 120.766529] [<ffffffff813c4294>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 120.766529]
[ 120.766529] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 120.766529]
[ 120.766529] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 120.766529]
[ 120.766529] CPU0 CPU1
[ 120.766529] ---- ----
[ 120.766529] lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO);
[ 120.766529]
lock(&(&conn->lock)->rlock#2);
[ 120.766529]
lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO);
[ 120.766529] lock(&(&conn->lock)->rlock#2);
[ 120.766529]
[ 120.766529] *** DEADLOCK ***
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/bluetooth')
-rw-r--r-- | net/bluetooth/sco.c | 19 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/sco.c b/net/bluetooth/sco.c index 40bbe25dcff7..3589e21edb09 100644 --- a/net/bluetooth/sco.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/sco.c @@ -131,6 +131,15 @@ static int sco_conn_del(struct hci_conn *hcon, int err) sco_sock_clear_timer(sk); sco_chan_del(sk, err); bh_unlock_sock(sk); + + sco_conn_lock(conn); + conn->sk = NULL; + sco_pi(sk)->conn = NULL; + sco_conn_unlock(conn); + + if (conn->hcon) + hci_conn_put(conn->hcon); + sco_sock_kill(sk); } @@ -821,16 +830,6 @@ static void sco_chan_del(struct sock *sk, int err) BT_DBG("sk %p, conn %p, err %d", sk, conn, err); - if (conn) { - sco_conn_lock(conn); - conn->sk = NULL; - sco_pi(sk)->conn = NULL; - sco_conn_unlock(conn); - - if (conn->hcon) - hci_conn_put(conn->hcon); - } - sk->sk_state = BT_CLOSED; sk->sk_err = err; sk->sk_state_change(sk); |