diff options
| author | Hangbin Liu | 2019-12-22 10:51:14 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller | 2019-12-24 22:28:55 -0800 |
| commit | 8247a79efa2f28b44329f363272550c1738377de (patch) | |
| tree | 10426bd9fa86b7893fd965beff8fb917b58e24ca /net/ipv4/ip_vti.c | |
| parent | 7a1592bcb15d71400a98632727791d1e68ea0ee8 (diff) | |
vti: do not confirm neighbor when do pmtu update
When do IPv6 tunnel PMTU update and calls __ip6_rt_update_pmtu() in the end,
we should not call dst_confirm_neigh() as there is no two-way communication.
Although vti and vti6 are immune to this problem because they are IFF_NOARP
interfaces, as Guillaume pointed. There is still no sense to confirm neighbour
here.
v5: Update commit description.
v4: No change.
v3: Do not remove dst_confirm_neigh, but add a new bool parameter in
dst_ops.update_pmtu to control whether we should do neighbor confirm.
Also split the big patch to small ones for each area.
v2: Remove dst_confirm_neigh in __ip6_rt_update_pmtu.
Reviewed-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ipv4/ip_vti.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/ipv4/ip_vti.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c index 9b153c7fcbb4..e90b600c7a25 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t vti_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, mtu = dst_mtu(dst); if (skb->len > mtu) { - skb_dst_update_pmtu(skb, mtu); + skb_dst_update_pmtu_no_confirm(skb, mtu); if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP)) { icmp_send(skb, ICMP_DEST_UNREACH, ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED, htonl(mtu)); |