diff options
| author | Menglong Dong | 2022-06-27 20:16:25 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jakub Kicinski | 2022-06-28 22:11:45 -0700 |
| commit | d640516a65d8bec3e5f9ddccc3e15503277c7cbb (patch) | |
| tree | 3da3b8842d986a0cb9414d1be217e2e3f7acf3de /net/mptcp | |
| parent | eba3a9816ad11d4bba9e14acbc8737bdce6c067c (diff) | |
net: mptcp: fix some spelling mistake in mptcp
codespell finds some spelling mistake in mptcp:
net/mptcp/subflow.c:1624: interaces ==> interfaces
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1130: regarless ==> regardless
Just fix them.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220627121626.1595732-1-imagedong@tencent.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/mptcp')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | net/mptcp/subflow.c | 2 |
2 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c index e099f2a12504..3de83e2a2611 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c @@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ void mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ss } unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow); - /* always try to push the pending data regarless of re-injections: + /* always try to push the pending data regardless of re-injections: * we can possibly use backup subflows now, and subflow selection * is cheap under the msk socket lock */ diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c index 8841e8cd9ad8..ad565ff9ebc3 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c +++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c @@ -1617,7 +1617,7 @@ int mptcp_subflow_create_socket(struct sock *sk, struct socket **new_sock) /* the newly created socket really belongs to the owning MPTCP master * socket, even if for additional subflows the allocation is performed * by a kernel workqueue. Adjust inode references, so that the - * procfs/diag interaces really show this one belonging to the correct + * procfs/diag interfaces really show this one belonging to the correct * user. */ SOCK_INODE(sf)->i_ino = SOCK_INODE(sk->sk_socket)->i_ino; |