diff options
| author | Daniel Borkmann | 2016-08-12 22:17:17 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller | 2016-08-12 21:53:33 -0700 |
| commit | 747ea55e4f78fd980350c39570a986b8c1c3e4aa (patch) | |
| tree | 95db28dc3288ef964ebd07270880233b98ba09a3 /net | |
| parent | 601bbae0bc10d4306857b93d84240b039b3d9a6c (diff) | |
bpf: fix bpf_skb_in_cgroup helper naming
While hashing out BPF's current_task_under_cgroup helper bits, it came
to discussion that the skb_in_cgroup helper name was suboptimally chosen.
Tejun says:
So, I think in_cgroup should mean that the object is in that
particular cgroup while under_cgroup in the subhierarchy of that
cgroup. Let's rename the other subhierarchy test to under too. I
think that'd be a lot less confusing going forward.
[...]
It's more intuitive and gives us the room to implement the real
"in" test if ever necessary in the future.
Since this touches uapi bits, we need to change this as long as v4.8
is not yet officially released. Thus, change the helper enum and rename
related bits.
Fixes: 4a482f34afcc ("cgroup: bpf: Add bpf_skb_in_cgroup_proto")
Reference: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/658500/
Suggested-by: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/core/filter.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c index b5add4ef0d1d..bd9bf2e5fafa 100644 --- a/net/core/filter.c +++ b/net/core/filter.c @@ -2317,7 +2317,7 @@ bpf_get_skb_set_tunnel_proto(enum bpf_func_id which) } #ifdef CONFIG_SOCK_CGROUP_DATA -static u64 bpf_skb_in_cgroup(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5) +static u64 bpf_skb_under_cgroup(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5) { struct sk_buff *skb = (struct sk_buff *)(long)r1; struct bpf_map *map = (struct bpf_map *)(long)r2; @@ -2340,8 +2340,8 @@ static u64 bpf_skb_in_cgroup(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5) return cgroup_is_descendant(sock_cgroup_ptr(&sk->sk_cgrp_data), cgrp); } -static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_skb_in_cgroup_proto = { - .func = bpf_skb_in_cgroup, +static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_skb_under_cgroup_proto = { + .func = bpf_skb_under_cgroup, .gpl_only = false, .ret_type = RET_INTEGER, .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_CTX, @@ -2421,8 +2421,8 @@ tc_cls_act_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id) case BPF_FUNC_get_smp_processor_id: return &bpf_get_smp_processor_id_proto; #ifdef CONFIG_SOCK_CGROUP_DATA - case BPF_FUNC_skb_in_cgroup: - return &bpf_skb_in_cgroup_proto; + case BPF_FUNC_skb_under_cgroup: + return &bpf_skb_under_cgroup_proto; #endif default: return sk_filter_func_proto(func_id); |