diff options
author | Alice Ryhl | 2024-08-14 08:05:22 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Miguel Ojeda | 2024-08-23 06:26:57 +0200 |
commit | a48026315cd7b6018bd74831a6dc0586adbba1b9 (patch) | |
tree | c515cc5449a5891d6014b6eaeddd497b8d8388cb /rust | |
parent | 6cd341715558b8422f33509d9b99a1a0a5b4b29c (diff) |
rust: list: add tracking for ListArc
Add the ability to track whether a ListArc exists for a given value,
allowing for the creation of ListArcs without going through UniqueArc.
The `impl_list_arc_safe!` macro is extended with a `tracked_by` strategy
that defers the tracking of ListArcs to a field of the struct.
Additionally, the AtomicListArcTracker type is introduced, which can
track whether a ListArc exists using an atomic. By deferring the
tracking to a field of type AtomicListArcTracker, structs gain the
ability to create ListArcs without going through a UniqueArc.
Rust Binder uses this for some objects where we want to be able to
insert them into a linked list at any time. Using the
AtomicListArcTracker, we are able to check whether an item is already in
the list, and if not, we can create a `ListArc` and push it.
The macro has the ability to defer the tracking of ListArcs to a field,
using whatever strategy that field has. Since we don't add any
strategies other than AtomicListArcTracker, another similar option would
be to hard-code that the field should be an AtomicListArcTracker.
However, Rust Binder has a case where the AtomicListArcTracker is not
stored directly in the struct, but in a sub-struct. Furthermore, the
outer struct is generic:
struct Wrapper<T: ?Sized> {
links: ListLinks,
inner: T,
}
Here, the Wrapper struct implements ListArcSafe with `tracked_by inner`,
and then the various types used with `inner` also uses the macro to
implement ListArcSafe. Some of them use the untracked strategy, and some
of them use tracked_by with an AtomicListArcTracker. This way, Wrapper
just inherits whichever choice `inner` has made.
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240814-linked-list-v5-3-f5f5e8075da0@google.com
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'rust')
-rw-r--r-- | rust/kernel/list.rs | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | rust/kernel/list/arc.rs | 171 |
2 files changed, 170 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/rust/kernel/list.rs b/rust/kernel/list.rs index fb16ea43b2ba..8e1533ee987b 100644 --- a/rust/kernel/list.rs +++ b/rust/kernel/list.rs @@ -5,4 +5,4 @@ //! A linked list implementation. mod arc; -pub use self::arc::{impl_list_arc_safe, ListArc, ListArcSafe}; +pub use self::arc::{impl_list_arc_safe, AtomicTracker, ListArc, ListArcSafe, TryNewListArc}; diff --git a/rust/kernel/list/arc.rs b/rust/kernel/list/arc.rs index 966076da4a75..c5921a7d5966 100644 --- a/rust/kernel/list/arc.rs +++ b/rust/kernel/list/arc.rs @@ -7,9 +7,10 @@ use crate::alloc::{AllocError, Flags}; use crate::prelude::*; use crate::sync::{Arc, ArcBorrow, UniqueArc}; -use core::marker::Unsize; +use core::marker::{PhantomPinned, Unsize}; use core::ops::Deref; use core::pin::Pin; +use core::sync::atomic::{AtomicBool, Ordering}; /// Declares that this type has some way to ensure that there is exactly one `ListArc` instance for /// this id. @@ -48,9 +49,38 @@ pub trait ListArcSafe<const ID: u64 = 0> { unsafe fn on_drop_list_arc(&self); } +/// Declares that this type is able to safely attempt to create `ListArc`s at any time. +/// +/// # Safety +/// +/// The guarantees of `try_new_list_arc` must be upheld. +pub unsafe trait TryNewListArc<const ID: u64 = 0>: ListArcSafe<ID> { + /// Attempts to convert an `Arc<Self>` into an `ListArc<Self>`. Returns `true` if the + /// conversion was successful. + /// + /// This method should not be called directly. Use [`ListArc::try_from_arc`] instead. + /// + /// # Guarantees + /// + /// If this call returns `true`, then there is no [`ListArc`] pointing to this value. + /// Additionally, this call will have transitioned the tracking inside `Self` from not thinking + /// that a [`ListArc`] exists, to thinking that a [`ListArc`] exists. + fn try_new_list_arc(&self) -> bool; +} + /// Declares that this type supports [`ListArc`]. /// -/// When using this macro, it will only be possible to create a [`ListArc`] from a [`UniqueArc`]. +/// This macro supports a few different strategies for implementing the tracking inside the type: +/// +/// * The `untracked` strategy does not actually keep track of whether a [`ListArc`] exists. When +/// using this strategy, the only way to create a [`ListArc`] is using a [`UniqueArc`]. +/// * The `tracked_by` strategy defers the tracking to a field of the struct. The user much specify +/// which field to defer the tracking to. The field must implement [`ListArcSafe`]. If the field +/// implements [`TryNewListArc`], then the type will also implement [`TryNewListArc`]. +/// +/// The `tracked_by` strategy is usually used by deferring to a field of type +/// [`AtomicTracker`]. However, it is also possible to defer the tracking to another struct +/// using also using this macro. #[macro_export] macro_rules! impl_list_arc_safe { (impl$({$($generics:tt)*})? ListArcSafe<$num:tt> for $t:ty { untracked; } $($rest:tt)*) => { @@ -61,6 +91,39 @@ macro_rules! impl_list_arc_safe { $crate::list::impl_list_arc_safe! { $($rest)* } }; + (impl$({$($generics:tt)*})? ListArcSafe<$num:tt> for $t:ty { + tracked_by $field:ident : $fty:ty; + } $($rest:tt)*) => { + impl$(<$($generics)*>)? $crate::list::ListArcSafe<$num> for $t { + unsafe fn on_create_list_arc_from_unique(self: ::core::pin::Pin<&mut Self>) { + $crate::assert_pinned!($t, $field, $fty, inline); + + // SAFETY: This field is structurally pinned as per the above assertion. + let field = unsafe { + ::core::pin::Pin::map_unchecked_mut(self, |me| &mut me.$field) + }; + // SAFETY: The caller promises that there is no `ListArc`. + unsafe { + <$fty as $crate::list::ListArcSafe<$num>>::on_create_list_arc_from_unique(field) + }; + } + unsafe fn on_drop_list_arc(&self) { + // SAFETY: The caller promises that there is no `ListArc` reference, and also + // promises that the tracking thinks there is a `ListArc` reference. + unsafe { <$fty as $crate::list::ListArcSafe<$num>>::on_drop_list_arc(&self.$field) }; + } + } + unsafe impl$(<$($generics)*>)? $crate::list::TryNewListArc<$num> for $t + where + $fty: TryNewListArc<$num>, + { + fn try_new_list_arc(&self) -> bool { + <$fty as $crate::list::TryNewListArc<$num>>::try_new_list_arc(&self.$field) + } + } + $crate::list::impl_list_arc_safe! { $($rest)* } + }; + () => {}; } pub use impl_list_arc_safe; @@ -205,6 +268,52 @@ where } } + /// Try to create a new `ListArc`. + /// + /// This fails if this value already has a `ListArc`. + pub fn try_from_arc(arc: Arc<T>) -> Result<Self, Arc<T>> + where + T: TryNewListArc<ID>, + { + if arc.try_new_list_arc() { + // SAFETY: The `try_new_list_arc` method returned true, so we made the tracking think + // that a `ListArc` exists. This lets us create a `ListArc`. + Ok(unsafe { Self::transmute_from_arc(arc) }) + } else { + Err(arc) + } + } + + /// Try to create a new `ListArc`. + /// + /// This fails if this value already has a `ListArc`. + pub fn try_from_arc_borrow(arc: ArcBorrow<'_, T>) -> Option<Self> + where + T: TryNewListArc<ID>, + { + if arc.try_new_list_arc() { + // SAFETY: The `try_new_list_arc` method returned true, so we made the tracking think + // that a `ListArc` exists. This lets us create a `ListArc`. + Some(unsafe { Self::transmute_from_arc(Arc::from(arc)) }) + } else { + None + } + } + + /// Try to create a new `ListArc`. + /// + /// If it's not possible to create a new `ListArc`, then the `Arc` is dropped. This will never + /// run the destructor of the value. + pub fn try_from_arc_or_drop(arc: Arc<T>) -> Option<Self> + where + T: TryNewListArc<ID>, + { + match Self::try_from_arc(arc) { + Ok(list_arc) => Some(list_arc), + Err(arc) => Arc::into_unique_or_drop(arc).map(Self::from), + } + } + /// Transmutes an [`Arc`] into a `ListArc` without updating the tracking inside `T`. /// /// # Safety @@ -350,3 +459,61 @@ where U: ListArcSafe<ID> + ?Sized, { } + +/// A utility for tracking whether a [`ListArc`] exists using an atomic. +/// +/// # Invariant +/// +/// If the boolean is `false`, then there is no [`ListArc`] for this value. +#[repr(transparent)] +pub struct AtomicTracker<const ID: u64 = 0> { + inner: AtomicBool, + // This value needs to be pinned to justify the INVARIANT: comment in `AtomicTracker::new`. + _pin: PhantomPinned, +} + +impl<const ID: u64> AtomicTracker<ID> { + /// Creates a new initializer for this type. + pub fn new() -> impl PinInit<Self> { + // INVARIANT: Pin-init initializers can't be used on an existing `Arc`, so this value will + // not be constructed in an `Arc` that already has a `ListArc`. + Self { + inner: AtomicBool::new(false), + _pin: PhantomPinned, + } + } + + fn project_inner(self: Pin<&mut Self>) -> &mut AtomicBool { + // SAFETY: The `inner` field is not structurally pinned, so we may obtain a mutable + // reference to it even if we only have a pinned reference to `self`. + unsafe { &mut Pin::into_inner_unchecked(self).inner } + } +} + +impl<const ID: u64> ListArcSafe<ID> for AtomicTracker<ID> { + unsafe fn on_create_list_arc_from_unique(self: Pin<&mut Self>) { + // INVARIANT: We just created a ListArc, so the boolean should be true. + *self.project_inner().get_mut() = true; + } + + unsafe fn on_drop_list_arc(&self) { + // INVARIANT: We just dropped a ListArc, so the boolean should be false. + self.inner.store(false, Ordering::Release); + } +} + +// SAFETY: If this method returns `true`, then by the type invariant there is no `ListArc` before +// this call, so it is okay to create a new `ListArc`. +// +// The acquire ordering will synchronize with the release store from the destruction of any +// previous `ListArc`, so if there was a previous `ListArc`, then the destruction of the previous +// `ListArc` happens-before the creation of the new `ListArc`. +unsafe impl<const ID: u64> TryNewListArc<ID> for AtomicTracker<ID> { + fn try_new_list_arc(&self) -> bool { + // INVARIANT: If this method returns true, then the boolean used to be false, and is no + // longer false, so it is okay for the caller to create a new [`ListArc`]. + self.inner + .compare_exchange(false, true, Ordering::Acquire, Ordering::Relaxed) + .is_ok() + } +} |