aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/samples/seccomp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorStefano Brivio2020-08-19 23:59:14 +0200
committerPablo Neira Ayuso2020-08-21 17:36:52 +0200
commit226a88de473e475cb9f993682a1c7d0c2b451ad8 (patch)
tree7df46b851eb76363ef98f4d46b317562c821e316 /samples/seccomp
parentcc5453a5b7e90c39f713091a7ebc53c1f87d1700 (diff)
netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: Handle outcomes of tree rotations in overlap detection
Checks for partial overlaps on insertion assume that end elements are always descendant nodes of their corresponding start, because they are inserted later. However, this is not the case if a previous delete operation caused a tree rotation as part of rebalancing. Taking the issue reported by Andreas Fischer as an example, if we omit delete operations, the existing procedure works because, equivalently, we are inserting a start item with value 40 in the this region of the red-black tree with single-sized intervals: overlap flag 10 (start) / \ false 20 (start) / \ false 30 (start) / \ false 60 (start) / \ false 50 (end) / \ false 20 (end) / \ false 40 (start) if we now delete interval 30 - 30, the tree can be rearranged in a way similar to this (note the rotation involving 50 - 50): overlap flag 10 (start) / \ false 20 (start) / \ false 25 (start) / \ false 70 (start) / \ false 50 (end) / \ true (from rule a1.) 50 (start) / \ true 40 (start) and we traverse interval 50 - 50 from the opposite direction compared to what was expected. To deal with those cases, add a start-before-start rule, b4., that covers traversal of existing intervals from the right. We now need to restrict start-after-end rule b3. to cases where there are no occurring nodes between existing start and end elements, because addition of rule b4. isn't sufficient to ensure that the pre-existing end element we encounter while descending the tree corresponds to a start element of an interval that we already traversed entirely. Different types of overlap detection on trees with rotations resulting from re-balancing will be covered by nft test case sets/0044interval_overlap_1. Reported-by: Andreas Fischer <netfilter@d9c.eu> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1449 Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.6.x Fixes: 7c84d41416d8 ("netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: Detect partial overlaps on insertion") Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'samples/seccomp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions