diff options
| author | Leon Hwang | 2023-09-06 23:42:56 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman | 2023-11-20 11:51:51 +0100 |
| commit | ec18d7507f9d9bd091c02e900722a48263955144 (patch) | |
| tree | d83294e858e59b3d5d887189986a96018e3cf1c5 /tools/testing | |
| parent | 3e1d754b5ddf1f1c30e66fda7107528cf85d8e6e (diff) | |
selftests/bpf: Correct map_fd to data_fd in tailcalls
[ Upstream commit 96daa9874211d5497aa70fa409b67afc29f0cb86 ]
Get and check data_fd. It should not check map_fd again.
Meanwhile, correct some 'return' to 'goto out'.
Thank the suggestion from Maciej in "bpf, x64: Fix tailcall infinite
loop"[0] discussions.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/e496aef8-1f80-0f8e-dcdd-25a8c300319a@gmail.com/T/#m7d3b601066ba66400d436b7e7579b2df4a101033
Fixes: 79d49ba048ec ("bpf, testing: Add various tail call test cases")
Fixes: 3b0379111197 ("selftests/bpf: Add tailcall_bpf2bpf tests")
Fixes: 5e0b0a4c52d3 ("selftests/bpf: Test tail call counting with bpf2bpf and data on stack")
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230906154256.95461-1-hffilwlqm@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c | 32 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c index 58fe2c586ed7..09c189761926 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c @@ -271,11 +271,11 @@ static void test_tailcall_count(const char *which) data_map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "tailcall.bss"); if (CHECK_FAIL(!data_map || !bpf_map__is_internal(data_map))) - return; + goto out; data_fd = bpf_map__fd(data_map); - if (CHECK_FAIL(map_fd < 0)) - return; + if (CHECK_FAIL(data_fd < 0)) + goto out; i = 0; err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(data_fd, &i, &val); @@ -352,11 +352,11 @@ static void test_tailcall_4(void) data_map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "tailcall.bss"); if (CHECK_FAIL(!data_map || !bpf_map__is_internal(data_map))) - return; + goto out; data_fd = bpf_map__fd(data_map); - if (CHECK_FAIL(map_fd < 0)) - return; + if (CHECK_FAIL(data_fd < 0)) + goto out; for (i = 0; i < bpf_map__max_entries(prog_array); i++) { snprintf(prog_name, sizeof(prog_name), "classifier_%d", i); @@ -442,11 +442,11 @@ static void test_tailcall_5(void) data_map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "tailcall.bss"); if (CHECK_FAIL(!data_map || !bpf_map__is_internal(data_map))) - return; + goto out; data_fd = bpf_map__fd(data_map); - if (CHECK_FAIL(map_fd < 0)) - return; + if (CHECK_FAIL(data_fd < 0)) + goto out; for (i = 0; i < bpf_map__max_entries(prog_array); i++) { snprintf(prog_name, sizeof(prog_name), "classifier_%d", i); @@ -631,11 +631,11 @@ static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_2(void) data_map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "tailcall.bss"); if (CHECK_FAIL(!data_map || !bpf_map__is_internal(data_map))) - return; + goto out; data_fd = bpf_map__fd(data_map); - if (CHECK_FAIL(map_fd < 0)) - return; + if (CHECK_FAIL(data_fd < 0)) + goto out; i = 0; err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(data_fd, &i, &val); @@ -805,11 +805,11 @@ static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(bool noise) data_map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "tailcall.bss"); if (CHECK_FAIL(!data_map || !bpf_map__is_internal(data_map))) - return; + goto out; data_fd = bpf_map__fd(data_map); - if (CHECK_FAIL(map_fd < 0)) - return; + if (CHECK_FAIL(data_fd < 0)) + goto out; i = 0; val.noise = noise; @@ -872,7 +872,7 @@ static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_6(void) ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "tailcall retval"); data_fd = bpf_map__fd(obj->maps.bss); - if (!ASSERT_GE(map_fd, 0, "bss map fd")) + if (!ASSERT_GE(data_fd, 0, "bss map fd")) goto out; i = 0; |