diff options
| author | Gianluca Borello | 2017-01-09 10:19:48 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller | 2017-01-09 16:56:27 -0500 |
| commit | f0318d01b694485af9678a4e120328ae3555be6d (patch) | |
| tree | a5346893ba6a94ecab7394d57bbabd730e1bf59f /tools/testing | |
| parent | 5722569bb9c3bd922c4f10b5b2912fe88c255312 (diff) | |
bpf: allow adjusted map element values to spill
commit 484611357c19 ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays")
introduces the ability to do pointer math inside a map element value via
the PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ register type.
The current support doesn't handle the case where a PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ
is spilled into the stack, limiting several use cases, especially when
generating bpf code from a compiler.
Handle this case by explicitly enabling the register type
PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ to be spilled. Also, make sure that min_value and
max_value are reset just for BPF_LDX operations that don't result in a
restore of a spilled register from stack.
Signed-off-by: Gianluca Borello <g.borello@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 46 |
1 files changed, 46 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index b7732e557bf9..e7b075819c08 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -3396,6 +3396,52 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, }, + { + "map element value is preserved across register spilling", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 6), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 42), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -184), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, 0, 42), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr", + .result = ACCEPT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "map element value (adjusted) is preserved across register spilling", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, + offsetof(struct test_val, foo)), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 42), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -184), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, 0, 42), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .result = ACCEPT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, }; static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp) |