aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/workqueue
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTejun Heo2023-05-17 17:02:08 -1000
committerTejun Heo2023-05-17 17:02:08 -1000
commit616db8779b1e3f93075df691432cccc5ef3c3ba0 (patch)
tree0dbc61931da6d05b333f2c8021fee79c2c294ac7 /tools/workqueue
parentbdf8b9bfc131864f0fcef268b34123acfb6a1b59 (diff)
workqueue: Automatically mark CPU-hogging work items CPU_INTENSIVE
If a per-cpu work item hogs the CPU, it can prevent other work items from starting through concurrency management. A per-cpu workqueue which intends to host such CPU-hogging work items can choose to not participate in concurrency management by setting %WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE; however, this can be error-prone and difficult to debug when missed. This patch adds an automatic CPU usage based detection. If a concurrency-managed work item consumes more CPU time than the threshold (10ms by default) continuously without intervening sleeps, wq_worker_tick() which is called from scheduler_tick() will detect the condition and automatically mark it CPU_INTENSIVE. The mechanism isn't foolproof: * Detection depends on tick hitting the work item. Getting preempted at the right timings may allow a violating work item to evade detection at least temporarily. * nohz_full CPUs may not be running ticks and thus can fail detection. * Even when detection is working, the 10ms detection delays can add up if many CPU-hogging work items are queued at the same time. However, in vast majority of cases, this should be able to detect violations reliably and provide reasonable protection with a small increase in code complexity. If some work items trigger this condition repeatedly, the bigger problem likely is the CPU being saturated with such per-cpu work items and the solution would be making them UNBOUND. The next patch will add a debug mechanism to help spot such cases. v4: Documentation for workqueue.cpu_intensive_thresh_us added to kernel-parameters.txt. v3: Switch to use wq_worker_tick() instead of hooking into preemptions as suggested by Peter. v2: Lai pointed out that wq_worker_stopping() also needs to be called from preemption and rtlock paths and an earlier patch was updated accordingly. This patch adds a comment describing the risk of infinte recursions and how they're avoided. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/workqueue')
-rw-r--r--tools/workqueue/wq_monitor.py13
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/tools/workqueue/wq_monitor.py b/tools/workqueue/wq_monitor.py
index fc1643ba06b3..7c6f523b9164 100644
--- a/tools/workqueue/wq_monitor.py
+++ b/tools/workqueue/wq_monitor.py
@@ -11,6 +11,11 @@ https://github.com/osandov/drgn.
infl The number of currently in-flight work items.
+ CPUitsv The number of times a concurrency-managed work item hogged CPU
+ longer than the threshold (workqueue.cpu_intensive_thresh_us)
+ and got excluded from concurrency management to avoid stalling
+ other work items.
+
CMwake The number of concurrency-management wake-ups while executing a
work item of the workqueue.
@@ -53,6 +58,7 @@ WQ_MEM_RECLAIM = prog['WQ_MEM_RECLAIM']
PWQ_STAT_STARTED = prog['PWQ_STAT_STARTED'] # work items started execution
PWQ_STAT_COMPLETED = prog['PWQ_STAT_COMPLETED'] # work items completed execution
+PWQ_STAT_CPU_INTENSIVE = prog['PWQ_STAT_CPU_INTENSIVE'] # wq_cpu_intensive_thresh_us violations
PWQ_STAT_CM_WAKEUP = prog['PWQ_STAT_CM_WAKEUP'] # concurrency-management worker wakeups
PWQ_STAT_MAYDAY = prog['PWQ_STAT_MAYDAY'] # maydays to rescuer
PWQ_STAT_RESCUED = prog['PWQ_STAT_RESCUED'] # linked work items executed by rescuer
@@ -75,19 +81,23 @@ class WqStats:
'mem_reclaim' : self.mem_reclaim,
'started' : self.stats[PWQ_STAT_STARTED],
'completed' : self.stats[PWQ_STAT_COMPLETED],
+ 'cpu_intensive' : self.stats[PWQ_STAT_CPU_INTENSIVE],
'cm_wakeup' : self.stats[PWQ_STAT_CM_WAKEUP],
'mayday' : self.stats[PWQ_STAT_MAYDAY],
'rescued' : self.stats[PWQ_STAT_RESCUED], }
def table_header_str():
- return f'{"":>24} {"total":>8} {"infl":>5} {"CMwake":>7} {"mayday":>7} {"rescued":>7}'
+ return f'{"":>24} {"total":>8} {"infl":>5} '\
+ f'{"CPUitsv":>7} {"CMwake":>7} {"mayday":>7} {"rescued":>7}'
def table_row_str(self):
+ cpu_intensive = '-'
cm_wakeup = '-'
mayday = '-'
rescued = '-'
if not self.unbound:
+ cpu_intensive = str(self.stats[PWQ_STAT_CPU_INTENSIVE])
cm_wakeup = str(self.stats[PWQ_STAT_CM_WAKEUP])
if self.mem_reclaim:
@@ -97,6 +107,7 @@ class WqStats:
out = f'{self.name[-24:]:24} ' \
f'{self.stats[PWQ_STAT_STARTED]:8} ' \
f'{max(self.stats[PWQ_STAT_STARTED] - self.stats[PWQ_STAT_COMPLETED], 0):5} ' \
+ f'{cpu_intensive:>7} ' \
f'{cm_wakeup:>7} ' \
f'{mayday:>7} ' \
f'{rescued:>7} '