diff options
author | Tejun Heo | 2023-05-17 17:02:08 -1000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tejun Heo | 2023-05-17 17:02:08 -1000 |
commit | 616db8779b1e3f93075df691432cccc5ef3c3ba0 (patch) | |
tree | 0dbc61931da6d05b333f2c8021fee79c2c294ac7 /tools/workqueue | |
parent | bdf8b9bfc131864f0fcef268b34123acfb6a1b59 (diff) |
workqueue: Automatically mark CPU-hogging work items CPU_INTENSIVE
If a per-cpu work item hogs the CPU, it can prevent other work items from
starting through concurrency management. A per-cpu workqueue which intends
to host such CPU-hogging work items can choose to not participate in
concurrency management by setting %WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE; however, this can be
error-prone and difficult to debug when missed.
This patch adds an automatic CPU usage based detection. If a
concurrency-managed work item consumes more CPU time than the threshold
(10ms by default) continuously without intervening sleeps, wq_worker_tick()
which is called from scheduler_tick() will detect the condition and
automatically mark it CPU_INTENSIVE.
The mechanism isn't foolproof:
* Detection depends on tick hitting the work item. Getting preempted at the
right timings may allow a violating work item to evade detection at least
temporarily.
* nohz_full CPUs may not be running ticks and thus can fail detection.
* Even when detection is working, the 10ms detection delays can add up if
many CPU-hogging work items are queued at the same time.
However, in vast majority of cases, this should be able to detect violations
reliably and provide reasonable protection with a small increase in code
complexity.
If some work items trigger this condition repeatedly, the bigger problem
likely is the CPU being saturated with such per-cpu work items and the
solution would be making them UNBOUND. The next patch will add a debug
mechanism to help spot such cases.
v4: Documentation for workqueue.cpu_intensive_thresh_us added to
kernel-parameters.txt.
v3: Switch to use wq_worker_tick() instead of hooking into preemptions as
suggested by Peter.
v2: Lai pointed out that wq_worker_stopping() also needs to be called from
preemption and rtlock paths and an earlier patch was updated
accordingly. This patch adds a comment describing the risk of infinte
recursions and how they're avoided.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/workqueue')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/workqueue/wq_monitor.py | 13 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/tools/workqueue/wq_monitor.py b/tools/workqueue/wq_monitor.py index fc1643ba06b3..7c6f523b9164 100644 --- a/tools/workqueue/wq_monitor.py +++ b/tools/workqueue/wq_monitor.py @@ -11,6 +11,11 @@ https://github.com/osandov/drgn. infl The number of currently in-flight work items. + CPUitsv The number of times a concurrency-managed work item hogged CPU + longer than the threshold (workqueue.cpu_intensive_thresh_us) + and got excluded from concurrency management to avoid stalling + other work items. + CMwake The number of concurrency-management wake-ups while executing a work item of the workqueue. @@ -53,6 +58,7 @@ WQ_MEM_RECLAIM = prog['WQ_MEM_RECLAIM'] PWQ_STAT_STARTED = prog['PWQ_STAT_STARTED'] # work items started execution PWQ_STAT_COMPLETED = prog['PWQ_STAT_COMPLETED'] # work items completed execution +PWQ_STAT_CPU_INTENSIVE = prog['PWQ_STAT_CPU_INTENSIVE'] # wq_cpu_intensive_thresh_us violations PWQ_STAT_CM_WAKEUP = prog['PWQ_STAT_CM_WAKEUP'] # concurrency-management worker wakeups PWQ_STAT_MAYDAY = prog['PWQ_STAT_MAYDAY'] # maydays to rescuer PWQ_STAT_RESCUED = prog['PWQ_STAT_RESCUED'] # linked work items executed by rescuer @@ -75,19 +81,23 @@ class WqStats: 'mem_reclaim' : self.mem_reclaim, 'started' : self.stats[PWQ_STAT_STARTED], 'completed' : self.stats[PWQ_STAT_COMPLETED], + 'cpu_intensive' : self.stats[PWQ_STAT_CPU_INTENSIVE], 'cm_wakeup' : self.stats[PWQ_STAT_CM_WAKEUP], 'mayday' : self.stats[PWQ_STAT_MAYDAY], 'rescued' : self.stats[PWQ_STAT_RESCUED], } def table_header_str(): - return f'{"":>24} {"total":>8} {"infl":>5} {"CMwake":>7} {"mayday":>7} {"rescued":>7}' + return f'{"":>24} {"total":>8} {"infl":>5} '\ + f'{"CPUitsv":>7} {"CMwake":>7} {"mayday":>7} {"rescued":>7}' def table_row_str(self): + cpu_intensive = '-' cm_wakeup = '-' mayday = '-' rescued = '-' if not self.unbound: + cpu_intensive = str(self.stats[PWQ_STAT_CPU_INTENSIVE]) cm_wakeup = str(self.stats[PWQ_STAT_CM_WAKEUP]) if self.mem_reclaim: @@ -97,6 +107,7 @@ class WqStats: out = f'{self.name[-24:]:24} ' \ f'{self.stats[PWQ_STAT_STARTED]:8} ' \ f'{max(self.stats[PWQ_STAT_STARTED] - self.stats[PWQ_STAT_COMPLETED], 0):5} ' \ + f'{cpu_intensive:>7} ' \ f'{cm_wakeup:>7} ' \ f'{mayday:>7} ' \ f'{rescued:>7} ' |