aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/usr
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDarren Hart2009-09-21 22:30:38 -0700
committerIngo Molnar2009-09-22 10:37:44 +0200
commit0729e196147692d84d4c099fcff056eba2ed61d8 (patch)
tree5374dc5cd1cb2cfb3da1174b67ed07685592e83a /usr
parentd8d88fbb186fe3ea37b2a58adb32413c98b59656 (diff)
futex: Fix wakeup race by setting TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE before queue_me()
PI futexes do not use the same plist_node_empty() test for wakeup. It was possible for the waiter (in futex_wait_requeue_pi()) to set TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE after the waker assigned the rtmutex to the waiter. The waiter would then note the plist was not empty and call schedule(). The task would not be found by any subsequeuent futex wakeups, resulting in a userspace hang. By moving the setting of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE to before the call to queue_me(), the race with the waker is eliminated. Since we no longer call get_user() from within queue_me(), there is no need to delay the setting of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE until after the call to queue_me(). The FUTEX_LOCK_PI operation is not affected as futex_lock_pi() relies entirely on the rtmutex code to handle schedule() and wakeup. The requeue PI code is affected because the waiter starts as a non-PI waiter and is woken on a PI futex. Remove the crusty old comment about holding spinlocks() across get_user() as we no longer do that. Correct the locking statement with a description of why the test is performed. Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com> Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> LKML-Reference: <20090922053038.8717.97838.stgit@Aeon> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'usr')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions