diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_tm.c | 28 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_tm_builtin.c | 16 |
3 files changed, 40 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_asm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_asm.h index 635fb154b33f..a3633560493b 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_asm.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_asm.h @@ -150,4 +150,7 @@ #define KVM_INST_FETCH_FAILED -1 +/* Extract PO and XOP opcode fields */ +#define PO_XOP_OPCODE_MASK 0xfc0007fe + #endif /* __POWERPC_KVM_ASM_H__ */ diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_tm.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_tm.c index 0db937497169..cc90b8b82329 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_tm.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_tm.c @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ * Copyright 2017 Paul Mackerras, IBM Corp. <paulus@au1.ibm.com> */ +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt + #include <linux/kvm_host.h> #include <asm/kvm_ppc.h> @@ -44,7 +46,18 @@ int kvmhv_p9_tm_emulation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) u64 newmsr, bescr; int ra, rs; - switch (instr & 0xfc0007ff) { + /* + * rfid, rfebb, and mtmsrd encode bit 31 = 0 since it's a reserved bit + * in these instructions, so masking bit 31 out doesn't change these + * instructions. For treclaim., tsr., and trechkpt. instructions if bit + * 31 = 0 then they are per ISA invalid forms, however P9 UM, in section + * 4.6.10 Book II Invalid Forms, informs specifically that ignoring bit + * 31 is an acceptable way to handle these invalid forms that have + * bit 31 = 0. Moreover, for emulation purposes both forms (w/ and wo/ + * bit 31 set) can generate a softpatch interrupt. Hence both forms + * are handled below for these instructions so they behave the same way. + */ + switch (instr & PO_XOP_OPCODE_MASK) { case PPC_INST_RFID: /* XXX do we need to check for PR=0 here? */ newmsr = vcpu->arch.shregs.srr1; @@ -105,7 +118,8 @@ int kvmhv_p9_tm_emulation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) vcpu->arch.shregs.msr = newmsr; return RESUME_GUEST; - case PPC_INST_TSR: + /* ignore bit 31, see comment above */ + case (PPC_INST_TSR & PO_XOP_OPCODE_MASK): /* check for PR=1 and arch 2.06 bit set in PCR */ if ((msr & MSR_PR) && (vcpu->arch.vcore->pcr & PCR_ARCH_206)) { /* generate an illegal instruction interrupt */ @@ -140,7 +154,8 @@ int kvmhv_p9_tm_emulation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) vcpu->arch.shregs.msr = msr; return RESUME_GUEST; - case PPC_INST_TRECLAIM: + /* ignore bit 31, see comment above */ + case (PPC_INST_TRECLAIM & PO_XOP_OPCODE_MASK): /* check for TM disabled in the HFSCR or MSR */ if (!(vcpu->arch.hfscr & HFSCR_TM)) { /* generate an illegal instruction interrupt */ @@ -176,7 +191,8 @@ int kvmhv_p9_tm_emulation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) vcpu->arch.shregs.msr &= ~MSR_TS_MASK; return RESUME_GUEST; - case PPC_INST_TRECHKPT: + /* ignore bit 31, see comment above */ + case (PPC_INST_TRECHKPT & PO_XOP_OPCODE_MASK): /* XXX do we need to check for PR=0 here? */ /* check for TM disabled in the HFSCR or MSR */ if (!(vcpu->arch.hfscr & HFSCR_TM)) { @@ -208,6 +224,8 @@ int kvmhv_p9_tm_emulation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) } /* What should we do here? We didn't recognize the instruction */ - WARN_ON_ONCE(1); + kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGILL); + pr_warn_ratelimited("Unrecognized TM-related instruction %#x for emulation", instr); + return RESUME_GUEST; } diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_tm_builtin.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_tm_builtin.c index 217246279dfa..fad931f224ef 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_tm_builtin.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_tm_builtin.c @@ -23,7 +23,18 @@ int kvmhv_p9_tm_emulation_early(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) u64 newmsr, msr, bescr; int rs; - switch (instr & 0xfc0007ff) { + /* + * rfid, rfebb, and mtmsrd encode bit 31 = 0 since it's a reserved bit + * in these instructions, so masking bit 31 out doesn't change these + * instructions. For the tsr. instruction if bit 31 = 0 then it is per + * ISA an invalid form, however P9 UM, in section 4.6.10 Book II Invalid + * Forms, informs specifically that ignoring bit 31 is an acceptable way + * to handle TM-related invalid forms that have bit 31 = 0. Moreover, + * for emulation purposes both forms (w/ and wo/ bit 31 set) can + * generate a softpatch interrupt. Hence both forms are handled below + * for tsr. to make them behave the same way. + */ + switch (instr & PO_XOP_OPCODE_MASK) { case PPC_INST_RFID: /* XXX do we need to check for PR=0 here? */ newmsr = vcpu->arch.shregs.srr1; @@ -73,7 +84,8 @@ int kvmhv_p9_tm_emulation_early(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) vcpu->arch.shregs.msr = newmsr; return 1; - case PPC_INST_TSR: + /* ignore bit 31, see comment above */ + case (PPC_INST_TSR & PO_XOP_OPCODE_MASK): /* we know the MSR has the TS field = S (0b01) here */ msr = vcpu->arch.shregs.msr; /* check for PR=1 and arch 2.06 bit set in PCR */ |